Skip to comments.
Limbaugh and Black get the Goods on Brischer
The Rush Limbaugh Website ^
| 1-26-04
| Rush Limbaugh
Posted on 01/26/2004 9:17:19 PM PST by Angelica411
Caller's office received a public records request in Rush Limbaugh case. File includes letters from atty in SAO to Roy Black, defense counsel. Checked with AG's office and AG says the files are public records except there are two letters which include plea negotiations which are not normally to be revealed so may or may not be public record.
...
All info in file is confidential as to his client, the state, under 4-1.6.
(Excerpt) Read more at rushlimbaugh.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: krischer; limbaugh; loveyourush; rush
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-256 next last
The Florida Bar submits a letter repudiating Barry Krischer's bogus claim that he asked for and received their clearance before releasing Roy Black's correspondence and the Palm Beach SAO's response.
Further, the letter tends to indicate that the Bar made clear that the SAO could not release this correspondence. This is a direct contradiction to what Krischer and mouthpiece Edmonson have claimed.
Rush publishes the actual letter on his website!
To: Angelica411
Btt.
2
posted on
01/26/2004 9:19:44 PM PST
by
PSYCHO-FREEP
(Careful! Your TAGS are the mirror of your SOUL!)
To: Angelica411
Trouble --- sounds like some one is going to be out of work and doing the "perp - walk," and it's not Rush!
3
posted on
01/26/2004 9:20:58 PM PST
by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: Angelica411
I see a $50 fine and 5-hours community service
4
posted on
01/26/2004 9:22:49 PM PST
by
GeronL
(miss me?? I've been gone... you mean you didn't even notice?? wwaaaaaaaaaaa!!!)
To: GeronL
Really? I see a looming 42 USC 1983 suit against the prosecuting attorney's office, with a bucket of money at the end of it.
To: Angelica411
These SOB's should be sued until the cows refuse to come home due to lack of food. Maybe after the local population has to ante up a multi-million dollar settlement they will be less forgiving of the Leftist dirtbags they constantly elect to public office. The mantra ought to be: "Elect a radical tax-and-spend Dim, pay an extra $25,000. Hope that's OK with you."
6
posted on
01/26/2004 9:35:25 PM PST
by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
(Any day you wake up is a good day.)
To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
7
posted on
01/26/2004 9:44:27 PM PST
by
holdonnow
To: Angelica411
8
posted on
01/26/2004 9:51:58 PM PST
by
soozla
(LIBERALS are the suckiest bunch of suckers that ever sucked!)
To: TheConservator
my thought too. Sue for a couple million and make the SA uncomfortable. If they try to pursue charges, ask for the trial to bo moved on the grounds that the SA office has a conflict of interest because of being named in the pending civil suit.
9
posted on
01/26/2004 10:01:32 PM PST
by
BOBWADE
To: holdonnow
Of course the Left will attack Rush with whatever they have available to destroy or discredit him. The Clintons are certainly pumping the bellows.
But, that aside, as someone who suffered unimaginable agony following a car acident years ago, I am convinced that a substantial "unintended consequence" of the "war on drugs" has been that pain is severely under-treated in the USA. This IMO has prompted Rush and I am sure many other otherwise responsible citizens to "other methods" of reducing their physical pain.
In my case I can vividly recall waiting for hours in agony between "pain shots" because the "prescribed dose period" had not yet expired. That experience left me with a gut-level distrust for doctors (as much as I otherwise admired them). It took me a while to understand that it was most likely the "system" and the "government" that was to blame.
Releif of pain is probably the strongest component of life force, after birth. The fact that the government has yet to manage this, and has been sidetracked by the moronic "war on drugs", is a black mark on society (IMO).
10
posted on
01/26/2004 10:02:00 PM PST
by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
(Any day you wake up is a good day.)
To: RS
'unimaginable agony', where is all this going?
11
posted on
01/26/2004 10:20:11 PM PST
by
Sarah
To: Angelica411
Private medical records aside, I don't see how Rush can squirm out of these charges.
To: Angelica411; All
This is such great news! I bet Hillary is having another screeming fit.
In case you haven't been informed .. the Cline's (maid and hubby) attorney is THE SON OF A CLINTON APPOINTEE!!
THIS IS NOT A COINCIDENCE. This is why the Clintons appointed these people .. so they could use them. But .. this ties the Clintons to this case. Of course, I always knew they were anyway.
13
posted on
01/26/2004 10:33:33 PM PST
by
CyberAnt
("America is the GREATEST NATION on the face of the earth")
To: GeronL
Really .. I SEE DEFINITE ETHICS CHARGES, AND POSSIBLE DISBARMENT!!
14
posted on
01/26/2004 10:34:51 PM PST
by
CyberAnt
("America is the GREATEST NATION on the face of the earth")
To: TheConservator
What does the 42 USC 1983 cover ..??
15
posted on
01/26/2004 10:35:47 PM PST
by
CyberAnt
("America is the GREATEST NATION on the face of the earth")
To: My Dog Likes Me
Uh, please correct me if I'm in error. As of this minute (pls note time of mssg), precisely NO ''charges'' have been filed against Mr. Limbaugh.
The County PA has been ''investigating'' (whatever that means) for some time.
Let's just keep the facts straight here, please.
16
posted on
01/26/2004 10:37:03 PM PST
by
SAJ
To: Angelica411
I have no idea what any of this means. What letter from Black and all that? Not everyone is following every little speck of this story.
Maybe someone can do a 1. 2. 3. step by step for us slow folks who have kids and can't follow the Palm Beach soaps.
17
posted on
01/26/2004 10:39:58 PM PST
by
TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig
(I like it so shaddup./sarcasm Heaven's just a sin away, oh heaven's just a sin away.)
To: TheConservator
Right indeed. But one would hope Mr. Limbaugh would show his entirely justified contempt for the rei priori, and simply sue for $1.00 in currency -- to be duly wiped across the PA's anus in his own good and convenient time.
18
posted on
01/26/2004 10:41:01 PM PST
by
SAJ
To: My Dog Likes Me
Charges? What charges?
There has been a lot of posturing and innuendo, but no charges.
To: My Dog Likes Me
I agree.
20
posted on
01/26/2004 10:47:21 PM PST
by
LisaMalia
(Buckeye Fan since birth!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-256 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson