[labolarueda]

"I have a long way to go."

Yes, you do, especially if you check the other posts on itshappening.com, the EOM_Daleel thread on Yahoo and a few other sites which escape me at this time.

You see, scaremongering and rumors are very effective in maintaining the momentum. The issue is momentum. Maintain the momentum and the hits to the site will materilize. What an opportunity of a lifetime!

In the meantime I'll wait for Sean to post his proof that OBL has been captured. I had made a request and I'm sure he won't disappoint us. Anxiously awaiting...

[Sean Osborne Lomax]

"In the meantime I'll wait for Sean to post his proof that OBL has been captured."

I posted the response.

There is no "proof" he was captured by US SOF on January 20.

What we have is evidence of the capture.

We have as evidence the original, unsolicited call to the NEIN Director from an individual at an "agency in Virginia", and subsequent "confirmations" that the event did indeed occur. There are also the subsequent events and statements which have been analyzed and found to be consistent with the information about OBL's capture.

All of this is the basis for my own conclusion and position on this subject. This is my personal assessment, US SOF captured Osama bin Laden on or about 20 January 2004.

[LayoutGuru2]

Great tagline. I am counting the days to see this film.

[Labyrinthos]

The proof that OBL has been captured comes from secret sources that can't be disclosed for national security reasons. And while those secret sources didn't actually acknowledge that OBL has, in fact, been captured, they refused to deny that he had been captured, which apparently means in spook talk that OBL has been "bagged and tagged."

I was once told that "annonymous sources" in the news buisness means "two reporters sitting around a bar getting hammered and speculating as to what might have happened." Maybe the intelligence business works the same way.