To: StillProud2BeFree
"Secondly the second they detonate a nuke then the US and Israel is going to come down on them with their full wrath. There is no way that we will tolerate Al Qaeda as a confirmed nuclear power. I wouldn't want to be the leader of a nation that tells Bush NO when he asks to come in after Bin Lader if Osama detonates a nuke."
Just who and what would we nuke?
Saudia Arabia? Well that would potentially render oil reserves contaminated and unuseable.
Iran? If they have a treaty with Russia that prevents obvious problems.
Iraq? Well our troops would be in harms way.
North Korea? It is understood that they do have a limited ICBM. (Good bye LA)?
Afghanistan? Well we could nuke some mountains on the Border of Pakistan. To what effect, who knows?
Syria? They do have Bio/Chem and will probably launch against Israel if they are threatened with a massive attack. There wouldn't be much warning for israeli citizens to allow them to prepare.
I think any use of WMDs (Nuke or Bio/Chem) against the US mainland presents some very difficult issues with regards to our response. AQ does not have a clear base of operations to attack. I'd guess the logical response would be a conventional repsonse, an even greater callup or Draft of soldiers and invasions of other Middle Eastern nations like Syria and Iran.
2,370 posted on
01/30/2004 6:41:51 AM PST by
SCR1
To: SCR1
I think any use of WMDs (Nuke or Bio/Chem) against the US mainland presents some very difficult issues with regards to our response.
I always doubted our retailiation also because who would we hit
2,435 posted on
01/30/2004 9:00:21 AM PST by
JustPiper
(Register Republican and Write-In Tom Tancredo in March)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson