AND you would be wrong on that point ...
I've got devices (actual working physical devices or 'product') that I created ('invented' if you will) that defied the 'conventional' thinking (by the masses, or at least the 'masses' that know about and use such devices) at the time of their introduction.
I arrived at their derivation by thinking outside the box BUT within the established, WELL KNOWN AND PROVEN TIME AND TIME AGAIN laws of physics.
We have a saying, those of us that work with "nature's laws" that we have discovered, and proven time and time again:
There is no cheating nature at her own game.
You can work with her you cannot work against her and make up your own rules.
People like you have no appreciation for actual lab work that either proves or disproves various wild-eyed 'theories' proposed by crackpots - which brings me to the second saying:
The proof is in the pudding.
Which means - WHEN you build something, it either it works or it doesn't, and to date NOTHING in the way of 'free energy' or Zero point energy has EVER been proven possible.
Splitting the atom (HAVE you forgotten about this equation: E=MC2) HAS been proven to be the CLOSEST thing to 'free energy' that mankind has ever seen ...