To: F16Fighter
Name-calling is also a sign of insecurity. Unfortunately at least for now, you've illustrated you are very much in line with my assessment of Jonah.
His article went straight down the tubes in credibility with his qualification of being an "intellectual" conservative. That's my point. I won't be fooled by a thinly veiled hit piece disguised as "conservative concern".
Too bad so many easily are.
Prairie
256 posted on
01/23/2004 9:58:44 AM PST by
prairiebreeze
(God Bless and Protect the Allied Troops. And the families here at home---they are soldiers too.)
To: prairiebreeze
I won't be fooled by a thinly veiled hit piece disguised as "conservative concern". So, what do you think Jonah's motive was for writing this "hit piece" (since you completely dismiss that his being a concerned conservative is an option). What exactly, iyo, is his "agenda." Is he a closet liberal? A DNC mole?
To: prairiebreeze
"His article went straight down the tubes in credibility with his qualification of being an "intellectual" conservative. That's my point. I won't be fooled by a thinly veiled hit piece disguised as "conservative concern"." So let see... with this logic, if there was a house on fire and a "bed wetting liberal liar" yelled, FIRE.... then you would not believe that there really could be a fire? You would not check out the facts and see for yourself just in case he was right and you needed to take some action..... nope, even if you "smelled smoke" you would say, "I won't be fooled". Great logic!
264 posted on
01/23/2004 10:15:29 AM PST by
Apple Pan Dowdy
(... as American as Apple Pie)
To: prairiebreeze
"Name-calling is also a sign of insecurity. Unfortunately at least for now, you've illustrated you are very much in line with my assessment of Jonah."Speaking of "name-calling," it was you who called Jonah Goldberg a "mole," "snobbish," and implied he was in fact an operative of the DNC -- wasn't it?
"His article went straight down the tubes in credibility with his qualification of being an 'intellectual' conservative. That's my point. I won't be fooled by a thinly veiled hit piece disguised as 'conservative concern'."
Is it simply that any opinions or viewpoints which criticize Dubya Bush's centrist policies are deemed mutinous, OR is it your contention Goldberg is a liar?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson