[Apple Pan Dowdy]

"His article went straight down the tubes in credibility with his qualification of being an "intellectual" conservative. That's my point. I won't be fooled by a thinly veiled hit piece disguised as "conservative concern"."

So let see... with this logic, if there was a house on fire and a "bed wetting liberal liar" yelled, FIRE.... then you would not believe that there really could be a fire? You would not check out the facts and see for yourself just in case he was right and you needed to take some action..... nope, even if you "smelled smoke" you would say, "I won't be fooled". Great logic!

[prairiebreeze]

If the person yelling FIRE feels compelled to interject that he is the only one capable of determining that there is a fire or that only he is smart enough to yell about it....does that make you start smelling the smoke in sympathy?

You refuse to acknowlege my biggest complaint about the article. And that's OK if that's the way it is for you. But I didn't call him a bed-wetting liberal liar did I?

I wondered aloud if he is a mole. And I'm still curious about that.

Prairie