Skip to comments.
Obesity fight hits taxpayers
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution ^
| 1/22/04
| DAVID WAHLBERG
Posted on 01/22/2004 12:48:56 AM PST by calcowgirl
Obesity in the United States, which affects nearly one-third of adults -- costs $75 billion a year in medical expenses, half of it funded by taxpayers through Medicare and Medicaid, a new study says.
Treatment of obesity, ranging from clinic visits to gastric bypass surgeries, amounts to $350 a year for each adult, according to the study released Wednesday by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta and RTI International, a nonprofit research firm in North Carolina.
The percentage of American adults considered obese has doubled in the last 25 years, fueling a rise in chronic diseases such as diabetes and heart disease, the CDC said.
"Obesity has become a crucial health problem for our nation, and these findings show that the medical costs alone reflect the significance of the challenge," said Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson. "We must take responsibility both as individuals and working together to reduce the health toll associated with obesity."
Both Thompson and Dr. Julie Gerberding, CDC director, have declared obesity a major health concern.
The new study -- which doesn't include children, whose obesity rates are soaring -- found that 5.7 percent of the nation's health care expenses are for treatment of obesity. That is roughly the same percentage spent on treatment for the effects of smoking.
The burden is greater for taxpayer-funded programs: 6.8 percent of Medicare costs and 10.6 percent of Medicaid costs are spent on treatment of obesity.
Medicare is a federal program for seniors and the disabled, and Medicaid is a federal and state program for the poor.
The study, the first to break down obesity costs by state, focuses on all medical expenses incurred by obese people that exceed the medical expenses of the non-obese. This included all costs for all medical treatment, whether paid by private insurance or public programs. Indirect costs, such as lost productivity and time away from work, were not considered.
California spends the most on obesity overall -- $7.7 billion a year -- and through Medicare -- $1.7 billion. New York tops the list in obesity-related Medicaid expenses at $3.5 billion. Alaska and the District of Columbia spend the largest share of medical expenses on obesity -- 6.7 percent.
Wyoming spends the least treating obesity each year, at $87 million. Arizona spends the smallest share of its health care dollars on obesity, at 4 percent.
A state's obesity costs are influenced by its obesity rate, its population, the amount of managed care and the extent to which public programs pay for medical expenses. High costs can result from generous health care programs as well as a high incidence of obesity.
"This allows each state to see how much they spend on obesity," said Eric Finkelstein, an RTI researcher. "It should encourage states and employers to figure out how to reduce these costs."
States can support nutrition and fitness programs to reduce obesity costs in future years, Finkelstein said. Some employers offer perks to workers who enroll in exercise programs or otherwise keep health care costs down. Georgia's obesity rate is 23.5 percent, compared with the national average of 22.1 percent, according to a CDC survey that relies on self-reporting by participants. A more robust CDC study, not broken down by state, puts the national rate at 31 percent.
In the new study, Georgia comes in slightly higher than the national average on obesity costs. The state spends $2.1 billion treating obesity, or 6 percent of its overall health care costs. Obesity accounts for $405,000, or 7.1 percent, of Medicare spending and $385,000, or 10.1 percent, of Medicaid spending in Georgia.
Gov. Sonny Perdue's budget for next year calls for greater cuts in public health spending than the 5 percent reduction across the board in spending by state agency. But that doesn't mean obesity isn't an important issue, Perdue spokesman Dan McLagan said.
"The governor's focus is on children, education and job creation," he said. "Sadly, everything can't be funded."
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Alaska; US: Arizona; US: California; US: District of Columbia; US: Georgia; US: New York; US: Wyoming
KEYWORDS: healthcare; medicaid; medicare; nannystate; obesity; pufflist; sonnyperdue
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
To: calcowgirl
Lookout taxpayers! This is the argument the money grabbers used on the Smoking Issue. It was only a way to sell it to the public so they could justify persecuting smokers with obscene levels of taxation.
2
posted on
01/22/2004 12:53:21 AM PST
by
ETERNAL WARMING
(SHUT THE DOOR IN 2004!)
To: ETERNAL WARMING; red-dawg; Fiddlstix; RikaStrom; robomatik; ladyinred; error99; Max McGarrity; ...
And so it begins. If it weren't so disgusting, this would be funny.
Smokers never thought that they would become pariahs because they acquiesced to not smoking in certain situations.
Now it's the (for lack of a better term) "fattie's" turn.
I'm reminded of a quote, part of which goes:
When they came for the Jews, I said nothing, for I was not a Jew
When they came for .....
When they came for ME, there was no-one TO speak up.
Can you say "Hoist upon one's own petard"?
3
posted on
01/22/2004 1:12:54 AM PST
by
Don W
(Modesty has ruined more kidneys than liquor.)
To: calcowgirl
The obvious solution is to end taxpayer funded healthcare.
4
posted on
01/22/2004 1:49:55 AM PST
by
Flyer
(LOST - Tagline, disappeared 01/21/04, black Times New Roman, 73 characters - Reward!)
To: calcowgirl; billbears; 4ConservativeJustices; stainlessbanner
Just curious: Whatever happended to the hordes of militias in boots and field jackets of fanatical right-wing extremists who were gonna force their "version" of the Constitution and religion down everyone's throat only a few years ago? Remember, the media informed us that those zealots, along with AIDS were going to kill us all, in particular our children?
With this scheme to tax fast food and no doubt steaks and hamburgers on our grill--just wondering what happened to that militia threat, who would seemingly jump right in on this obtrusive plan of the socialists?
5
posted on
01/22/2004 2:21:37 AM PST
by
Ff--150
(What is Is)
To: Flyer
The obvious solution is to end taxpayer funded healthcare.And taxpayer funded food stamps. If are poor, how did they get fat?
6
posted on
01/22/2004 2:26:58 AM PST
by
putupon
(No blood for votes Bush!)
To: Don W; calcowgirl; ETERNAL WARMING; Flyer
I vill not smoke!
I vill not overeat!
I vill not drink!
I vill exercise!
I vill be der UberAmerican!
7
posted on
01/22/2004 2:32:46 AM PST
by
metesky
(100 years ago a Junoesque woman was considered a beauty; now she's a fatty.)
To: Don W
Oh good grief.
Too many places to start... I think I will just go pack instead.
Morning Don.
8
posted on
01/22/2004 2:37:31 AM PST
by
RikaStrom
To: Ff--150; calcowgirl
But the Republicans are in control .... Surely, they are looking out for us, they believe in cheap, limited, non-intrusive government?
Don't they?
9
posted on
01/22/2004 2:52:52 AM PST
by
4CJ
(||) Dialing 911 doesn't stop a crime - a .45 does. (||)
To: Flyer
I agree. This is an indictment of how we fund medical care rather than on how we eat.
10
posted on
01/22/2004 3:08:03 AM PST
by
TN4Liberty
(Tag----------------- <==line)
To: 4ConservativeJustices
"But the Republicans are in control .... Surely, they are looking out for us, they believe in cheap, limited, non-intrusive government?"
Then, sir, the militia, driving those CJ's, are now in control?? Then, why they funding a scheme to tax fast food along the lines of the taxes on tobacco? It seems like the right-wing crazies would not allow that... ?
11
posted on
01/22/2004 3:15:56 AM PST
by
Ff--150
(What is Is)
To: TN4Liberty
"I agree. This is an indictment of how we fund medical care rather than on how we eat."
More to the point, this is compulsive behavior that is promoted by nice sounding but destructive social reengineering. The more the "socially responsible" repeat the mantra that people just can't make it anymore, there's no hope. When there's no hope, depression manifests itself in different ways for different people. What we do see is higher compulsive eating and spending in government dependent households.
The responsible are not responsible.
The not responsible, are responsible, but if their program causes harm, they are not responsible.
12
posted on
01/22/2004 4:43:21 AM PST
by
saveliberty
(Liberal= in need of therapy, but would rather ruin lives of those less fortunate to feel good)
To: ETERNAL WARMING; *puff_list; Just another Joe; Great Dane; Max McGarrity; Tumbleweed_Connection; ...
Lookout taxpayers! This is the argument the money grabbers used on the Smoking Issue. It was only a way to sell it to the public so they could justify persecuting smokers with obscene levels of taxation.Wake up America! They will be coming for YOU next!
13
posted on
01/22/2004 5:57:56 AM PST
by
SheLion
(Curiosity killed the cat BUT satisfaction brought her back!!!)
To: Flyer
Good idea. I can hear the screams of outrage now! "Where's my free health care! I deserve it!"
To: calcowgirl
15
posted on
01/22/2004 6:00:12 AM PST
by
SheLion
(Curiosity killed the cat BUT satisfaction brought her back!!!)
To: calcowgirl
Disgusting. Next, it will be all red heads or those with brown eyes.
To: SheLion
When a 10 oz bag of chips is $4.00, the sheeple will ask, "Why didn't someone warn us?" We can say, "We did!"
CG
17
posted on
01/22/2004 6:02:18 AM PST
by
Conspiracy Guy
(This tagline is made from 100% virtual material. Do not remove under penalty of law.)
To: SheLion
18
posted on
01/22/2004 6:03:56 AM PST
by
SheLion
(Curiosity killed the cat BUT satisfaction brought her back!!!)
To: calcowgirl
Well, we better institute punitive taxes on any food not approved by the state. That is clearly the only solution!
BWWWWWWWAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHAAAAAAA!
19
posted on
01/22/2004 6:10:23 AM PST
by
CSM
(Council member Carol Schwartz (R.-at large), my new hero! The Anti anti Smoke Gnatzie!)
To: Conspiracy Guy; SheLion
When a 10 oz bag of chips is $4.00, the sheeple will ask, "Why didn't someone warn us?" We can say, "We did!"We're buying loose tobacco and rolling our own, what's to stop us from making our own chips?
In Bangor I can buy a 50lb bag of Maine spuds for around $6.00.
I'm old enough to remember post-WWII scarcity when everybody made their own, made do or did without. I can live without Phillip Morris, Frito-Lay and most of the others.
But not Cains Mayonnaise. :O(
What will Big Tobacco and Big Food do without us?
I think these Lifestyle geeks are trying to crash the economy.
20
posted on
01/22/2004 6:22:47 AM PST
by
metesky
(I own a Fry-O-Lator and I'm not afraid to use it.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson