Replies

I have been trying to put it all together. Bush is a rich man from a rich family whose father blew it as president over "read my lips" and because he didn't do the right thing and take out Saddam when we were over there in 91.

He's been raised on globalist propaganda like some kids are raised on milk. The ignorant American citizen needs to be duped into what's best for them, or even worse, the American citizen stands in the way of big bucks and must be marginalized.

If he is a good man, he never once stopped to ask himself that if globalism is such a good deal for Americans why it must be snuck past free citizens of a free nation. At the very least it says he disdains our intelligence, or worse that he hates his fellow countrymen and believes us evil and standing in the way of globalist progress by clinging to our worn out Constitution, the last fortress and refuge from tyranny and the tyrant, that stands in the way of globalism and has them tearing their hair out designing ways to wrest it from us.

If he is an evil man then he is actively working towards the destruction of the majority population and working for an end to our constitutional republic form of government.

We know from Fox's statements that the two of them had meetings discussing how to implement the globalist agenda of melting our borders and forming one, no borders, federation along with Canada, bringing a standardization to wages. To be joined later by the rest of the Western hemisphere. I'm sure conservative, patriotic, common sense, Americans are seen as a major hinderance in the realization of those goals.

No one can deny that Bush hit the ground running in marginalizing his conservative base and pimping himself out to moderate democrats, hispanics, and everyone else he could think to cram in that "big tent" in order to marginalize us and leave us without any representation in the USofA. He was gambling and rolling the dice. Betting the farm.

He has two daughters that are not trilled with him being president, a new ranch he really hasn't gotten to live on, and a wife that misses her friends in Texas. So he's laid it all out on the table, to a point, he certainly hasn't been forth coming about dissolving our borders, or this federation that globalist politicians work under the radar to attain.

If Bush had worked as hard for his fellow countrymens best interest as he has to fulfill his promises to his old amigo Vicente Fox and his globalist pals, we could be impressed, even greatful. He has made it clear, to anyone with a lick of sense, through two stealth attempts at 245i and now this amnesty suggestion, that this is the most important and critical goal of his Presidency. If he cannot attain it I think he wants to find that out now, up front, and a second term is not that big a thing to him.

No matter what the true intentions in his heart of hearts, I think him a dangerous man, with a dangerous plan. The FTAA treaty is a huge globalist goal, it is the sword in the heart of a free and sovereign America, and Bush is already touting it for his second term. I think, hope, we send him to Crawford. Is he the only dangerous man we will ever face? No, we are swimming in a sea of sharks, attempting gridlock when we can, and knocking them down one at a time as we can. The danger that Bush poses is not different from the dangers the other's pose it's only packaged with a bow. Making his ability to implement greater damage more successful.

It's time for Americans to put aside our naive'te, stop jumping through our own backsides out of fear of not being seen as compassionate, or fear of being accused of being racist, because now they have come for your freedom and sovereignty, telling you that it is your duty and obligation to the third world to give it up. It's time to realize where your real and first responsiblity lies, your own survival as the nation of the free and the brave based on that rock, the Constitution of the United States.

Your post 247. Excellent post. Mirrors my thoughts on the situation.

However my feeling has always been that he didn't care much either way about taking or losing the office. Even during the 2000 election fiasco, I felt like I was watching Weekend at Bernies. The big guns sweeped in, took care of business, dressed him up and threw him in front of the microphone.

It is very easy to forget he is who he is. He comes across as this plain spoken, down home Christian. The modest ranch when he could easily have a very palatial estate. The marriage to a woman he only dated for 6 months. All very scripted if you ask me. The freepers fall for the whole charade--hook, line and sinker.

Scary, scary stuff to know this could be the beginning of the end.

Off to read if anyone responded. Love your posts--you truly get it. KE