Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Billthedrill
The problem is that burglary "charge" - if there's a felony conviction he isn't allowed to legally possess a firearm at all, whether his use of it in this case is justified or not.

The burglary charge was one of the perps, not the homeowner. The homeowner had a concealed carry permit which would not have been possible if he were a felon.

24 posted on 01/15/2004 8:21:34 AM PST by VRWCmember (We apologise for the fault in the taglines. Those responsible have been sacked.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: VRWCmember
Yes, yes, (sound of hand smacking forehead). You are, of course, correct.

Sounds like a no-brainer (so to speak). Well, there is that littering thing...

26 posted on 01/15/2004 8:23:40 AM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson