To: funkywbr
What Andy doesnt understand is that President Bush if elected and given the Senators he needs to work with will CHANGE!
It's a big risk on the Senator(s) part but worth it.
How do you know he will change? I am increasingly having doubts.
31 posted on
01/13/2004 12:19:59 PM PST by
RiflemanSharpe
(An American for a more socially and fiscally conservation America!)
To: RiflemanSharpe
Because look at what came out of the House VS what got worked on in the Senate.
One thing President Bush can not be accused of is not working on, as Clinton used to say, the Peoples Business.
And I guess I'm a neocon too, because I think that bankrupting the treasury will lead to less social programs and finally the fix of Social Security next year if all things work out all right.
And I also think that more tax cuts are coming in that he will put everything in place next year and remove them from being phased out too.
32 posted on
01/13/2004 12:24:19 PM PST by
funkywbr
To: RiflemanSharpe
Because look at what came out of the House VS what got worked on in the Senate.
One thing President Bush can not be accused of is not working on, as Clinton used to say, the Peoples Business.
And I guess I'm a neocon too, because I think that bankrupting the treasury will lead to less social programs and finally the fix of Social Security next year if all things work out all right.
And I also think that more tax cuts are coming in that he will put everything in place next year and remove them from being phased out too.
33 posted on
01/13/2004 12:24:30 PM PST by
funkywbr
To: RiflemanSharpe
Because look at what came out of the House VS what got worked on in the Senate.
One thing President Bush can not be accused of is not working on, as Clinton used to say, the Peoples Business.
And I guess I'm a neocon too, because I think that bankrupting the treasury will lead to less social programs and finally the fix of Social Security next year if all things work out all right.
And I also think that more tax cuts are coming in that he will put everything in place next year and remove them from being phased out too.
34 posted on
01/13/2004 12:24:59 PM PST by
funkywbr
To: RiflemanSharpe
If we can move both houses of Congress to the right Bush doesn't have to change. That's what the checks and balances are all about.
37 posted on
01/13/2004 12:26:18 PM PST by
discostu
(and the tenor sax is blowing its nose)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson