Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 50sDad
The real question is “Do we want Communist Dean or Fruit Cake Clark as President?”
3 posted on 01/13/2004 11:48:56 AM PST by COEXERJ145
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: COEXERJ145
The real question is “Do we want Communist Dean or Fruit Cake Clark as President?”

Another question is "do we want to miss the chance to have hefty majority in Congress?"

If not, then we need to figure out a way to keep President Bush from being so divisive.


17 posted on 01/13/2004 12:04:56 PM PST by Sabertooth (Eighteen solutions better than any Amnesty - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1053318/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: COEXERJ145
The real question is “Do we want Communist Dean or Fruit Cake Clark as President?”

No! The real question is what must we do to restore the Republic of the Founding Fathers. That will not be doable this November. But that does not mean that it is not doable.

The time has come to realize that we have been had by the present leadership of both parties in Washington. It is sad. I wish that it were not so. Until January 1, I was willing to criticize but still hope that the President would wake up, fire Rove and change direction. His original promise to appoint strict constructionists to the Bench was the incentive to want to stick with him.

But the sad reality is that he will twist arms for an absurd Medicare Bill. He will spout absolute inanities about "no child being left behind," as though anyone acquainted with the educational process really believes that every child has comparable aptitudes to keep up. He will twist arms on other issues, including getting Americans rather than Iraqis to pay for rebuilding Iraq. But he will not twist arms to get those "strict constructionists" on the Bench.

And this religious poseur, can even countermand the belated--terribly belated--action of his Attorney General--in finally cancelling "Gay Pride" observances in the Justice Department, in 2003. Why? Does he believe that anyone has an inherent right to use a Governmental job and facility to mock thousands of years of Western Moral values?

On immigration, he can propose a revolutionary change, without ever even considering the interests of mainstream Americans in the preservation of the traditional culture of the American people. (America is not a game of musical chairs. It really does matter whom we allow in, and what qualities they bring with them.)

A plague on Bush--the same plague one wishes on Dean, Clark & Gephardt. None of them is acceptable. You can compromise away your heritage in the belief that you are slowing down the hideous unfolding reality; but in point of fact, your willingness to compromise with this ugly reality, but hastens the demise of everything most of us hold dear.

Enough is enough! There are Republicans running this year, who will have my support. But the head of the ticket? Forget it! The best we can hope for, in the immediate future, is a squabbling stalemate in Washington, where nothing gets done. That is infinitely better than the agenda of any of the candidates.

William Flax Return Of The Gods Web Site

97 posted on 01/13/2004 2:35:33 PM PST by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson