To: NormsRevenge
Interesting implications.
If the feds have to compensate farmers for water diverted (stolen), will the fed also need to compensate property owners whose land was stolen to create de-facto federal nature preserves on private property?
6 posted on
01/13/2004 12:32:48 PM PST by
sergeantdave
(Gen. Custer wore an Arrowsmith shirt to his last property owner convention.)
To: sergeantdave
If the feds have to compensate farmers for water diverted (stolen), will the fed also need to compensate property owners whose land was stolen to create de-facto federal nature preserves on private property? They have to, if they want to follow the fifth amendment to the US Constitution which forbids them for taking private property for public use with out just compensation.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson