Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: aristeides
To repeat, I am more interested in the morality and legality of actions by my government than I am in the morality and legality of actions of another government.

I repeat, what other government? If it was legally doubtful, and made no attempt to establish its legitimacy, we can not recognize it as a government.

As to your concern about "your government" allow me to turn it around on you. Would they not have been derelict in their legal, moral and sworn constitutional duty to allow a legally doubtful regiem to assume control over 40% of the nation's territory without offering resistance?

I know damn well I'd be calling for impeachment if that were to happen today.

What would you do?

581 posted on 01/20/2004 12:37:19 PM PST by Ditto ( No trees were killed in sending this message, but billions of electrons were inconvenienced.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 578 | View Replies ]


To: Ditto
If the Confederacy was, as you argue, no government at all, then it was even further from being my government.

I believe the Confederacy as it existed prior to Lincoln's provoking the secession of the Upper South by resisting the secession of the Lower South occupied nothing close to 40% of the territory of the U.S. As a matter of fact, I suspect the Lower South, by itself, could not have made a go of it, and would eventually have sued for readmittance to the Union. Without a war. When the Upper South refused to secede, Lincoln won a great victory, which he then proceeded to throw away. All of this is not just my opinion. Seward thought the same at the time.

583 posted on 01/20/2004 12:43:38 PM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 581 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson