Replies

Like others here, you just wash your hands of the problem.

Stop it. We know what your agenda is here and it has nothing to do with saving these poor women from spousal abuse for refusing intercourse. It has everything to do with your simmering animus toward Humanae Vitae. That's all this is and for you to suggest otherwise is intellectually dishonest.

So, a guy who's not Catholic or even Christian is gonna CARE that you condemn him?

Do some reading as to how missionaries, priests, and bishops have traditionally dealt with unChristian sexual and cultural mores, then get back to me, ok? Hint: there was never a question of changing Christian moral teaching to accomodate cultural oddities.

No thought or concern for the woman here? She's the one begging for some help.

No, you're using her plight to callously advance a disgraceful political agenda within the Church. You're only interested in her insofar as she can provide an emotional component to your completely specious argument.

No, you're using her plight to callously advance a disgraceful political agenda within the Church

I can no longer talk to a friggin' disingenuous jerk like you!

I try to have an honest conversation, and you come in with the ad hominems.

You're an example of why the Church has trouble reaching people, because of arrogance!

No, you're using her plight to callously advance a disgraceful political agenda within the Church

I can no longer talk to a friggin' disingenuous jerk like you!

I try to have an honest conversation, and you come in with the ad hominems.

You're an example of why the Church has trouble reaching people, because of arrogance!

No, you're using her plight to callously advance a disgraceful political agenda within the Church

I can no longer talk to a friggin' disingenuous jerk like you!

I try to have an honest conversation, and you come in with the ad hominems.

You're an example of why the Church has trouble reaching people, because of arrogance!