[Polycarp IV]

So once again, there is nothing unreasonable in my interpreting that "he'd rather a woman die from AIDS." than to use condoms.

The author of the statement has already stated that your interpretation is not only unreasonable but also a lie, ruinous of his good name.

Spin your sin however you deem necessary. You ain't fooling us, and you sure as heck ain't fooling Him.

[Jorge]

Jorge"So once again, there is nothing unreasonable in my interpreting that "he'd rather a woman die from AIDS." than to use condoms."

The author of the statement has already stated that your interpretation is not only unreasonable but also a lie, ruinous of his good name.

Really? Where is it? I've seen no post by john2004 disputing my interpretation of what he said.

I more than welcome his right to clarify what he posted and to correct me if I have misrepresented anything he said, but he has NOT responded or challenged anything I've said.

Besides, another poster who AGREES with john2004's statement has defended it as correct..that it is better to get sick and die than commit the sin of using condoms.

So this poster who disagrees with me when it comes to Biblical doctrine, agrees with my interpretation of john2004's post.

So much for your claim that I have misrepresented john2004's post.