The author of the statement has already stated that your interpretation is not only unreasonable but also a lie, ruinous of his good name.
Really? Where is it? I've seen no post by john2004 disputing my interpretation of what he said.
I more than welcome his right to clarify what he posted and to correct me if I have misrepresented anything he said, but he has NOT responded or challenged anything I've said.
Besides, another poster who AGREES with john2004's statement has defended it as correct..that it is better to get sick and die than commit the sin of using condoms.
So this poster who disagrees with me when it comes to Biblical doctrine, agrees with my interpretation of john2004's post.
So much for your claim that I have misrepresented john2004's post.
So much for your claim that I have misrepresented john2004's post.
You are so pathetic a debater, its not even fun any more shooting down all your lies and errors. Its downright boring: