To: dead
Just for the record, I'd like to add the following statements from Cardinal Danneels with regard to homosexuality. They are quoted from an Alice von Hildebrand article in
New Oxford Review which may be found
here.
When he became Primate of Belgium in 1983, Godfried Cardinal Danneels opened, for the benefit of homosexuals, the Center of Welcome for One and All at the Catholic University of Louvain. When asked by a group of young people what he thought about homosexuality, Cardinal Danneels answered: "The question is not what one thinks about it; it is simply a fact. To be homosexual is a natural disposition, just as being heterosexual. One chooses neither one nor the other. The question is rather: 'What do I do with it?' I know excellent priests who are homosexuals; I also know excellent priests who are heterosexuals. Celibates are not 'nothing' that is, 'neuter.' We are always one or the other. But it cannot be denied that homosexuals are deprived of certain dimensions of existence: the distinction between man and woman, between parents and children. This clearly distinguishes them from heterosexuals. But this is no reason for excluding them
."
When asked whether he thought that a child adopted and raised by homosexuals would be less happy than one raised by heterosexuals, Cardinal Danneels responded: "A heterosexual marriage is richer because it can procreate its own children. [But] a lesbian couple can have children, thanks to artificial insemination, though this is a technical act. Psychologists will tell us whether this can create a problem
."
Does this sound like a Catholic bishop to anyone here? Is it any wonder why he's so fixated on getting around
Humanae Vitae?
312 posted on
01/14/2004 11:11:30 AM PST by
Antoninus
(In hoc signo, vinces †)
To: Antoninus
I really wonder how many of these guys have more than an "academic" interest in all this stuff?
To: CAtholic Family Association
To put Cardinal Danneel's statements about condoms in a wider context, here's what he's had to say about homosexuality:
When asked by a group of young people what he thought about homosexuality, Cardinal Danneels answered: "The question is not what one thinks about it; it is simply a fact. To be homosexual is a natural disposition, just as being heterosexual. One chooses neither one nor the other. The question is rather: 'What do I do with it?' I know excellent priests who are homosexuals; I also know excellent priests who are heterosexuals. Celibates are not 'nothing' that is, 'neuter.' We are always one or the other. But it cannot be denied that homosexuals are deprived of certain dimensions of existence: the distinction between man and woman, between parents and children. This clearly distinguishes them from heterosexuals. But this is no reason for excluding them
."
When asked whether he thought that a child adopted and raised by homosexuals would be less happy than one raised by heterosexuals, Cardinal Danneels responded: "A heterosexual marriage is richer because it can procreate its own children. [But] a lesbian couple can have children, thanks to artificial insemination, though this is a technical act. Psychologists will tell us whether this can create a problem
."
318 posted on
01/14/2004 11:21:44 AM PST by
Antoninus
(In hoc signo, vinces †)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson