Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

All Iranian Governors Threaten To Quit
Persian Journal ^ | 1/11/04 | Persian Journal

Posted on 01/11/2004 7:32:56 PM PST by freedom44

All of Iran's provincial governors have reportedly threatened to resign unless a move by powerful conservatives to disqualify large numbers of candidates from forthcoming elections is reversed. The 27 have imposed a deadline of a week, according to an open letter carried by the student news agency ISNA today. Earlier, Iran's interior ministry, the body responsible for organising elections, said that the move to disqualify candidates from next month's parliamentary election was "illegal" and would not be enforced. "The interior ministry regrets the massive rejection of candidates and affirms that a number of candidates have been disqualified outside the framework of the law," it said in a statement also carried by ISNA. "In the eyes of the interior ministry, the vetting of candidates must be done within the framework of the law, and any decision that does not take the law into account is without value and cannot be applied. "The ministry will defend the rights of candidates and voters and will not accept or apply any illegal action."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iran; iranreform; selfrule
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: freedom44
Now, that's a scary face......always was.
21 posted on 01/11/2004 8:37:51 PM PST by nuconvert ("This wasn't just plain terrible, this was fancy terrible. This was terrible with raisins in it. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
Question for those on this thread that are Persian or really follow Iran closely, because I never see this discussed in the media and am curious and have no idea myself...

Where does the Iranian ARMY stand politically?

Not talking about the Revolutionary Guards or Pasdaran or anything, the regular army. Obviously, they have most of the guns and are key to anything happening.

I would suspect many of the rank and file officers would have no love for the Mullahcracy, but I would also suspect that the Mullahs have installed "reliable" officers as commanders of units, particularly those in or near Teheran.

22 posted on 01/11/2004 9:15:43 PM PST by John H K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: freedom44
Join Us At Today's Iranian Alert Thread – The Most Underreported Story Of The Year!

Click on the link above!

"If you want on or off this Iran ping list, Freepmail DoctorZin”


23 posted on 01/11/2004 9:30:43 PM PST by DoctorZIn (Until they are free, we shall all be Iranians!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedom44
We are getting closer to the tipping point...
24 posted on 01/11/2004 9:31:21 PM PST by DoctorZIn (Until they are free, we shall all be Iranians!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John H K
Not sure of the military's "politics", but the regime doesn't trust them anymore to defend them. Afraid they'll side with the people. So they have "hired guns". Here's a quote from DoctorZin from an earlier thread.....

"the country's military is underarmed and under trained because the regime does not trust them. The regime has various armed groups the latest being Arab security forces who have little concern for Iranian citizens."
25 posted on 01/11/2004 9:37:30 PM PST by nuconvert ("This wasn't just plain terrible, this was fancy terrible. This was terrible with raisins in it. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
If outright rebellion begins and the head theocrats turn those hired Arab thugs loose to kill, rape, maim and torture the people of Iran, how long should we expect to see the Mullahs retain power: a week? A couple of days?

Anybody care to tender a guess?

26 posted on 01/11/2004 10:32:38 PM PST by goody2shooz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: goody2shooz
Things would be bloody, I don't know if it would be a short Romanian-style violent coup lasting a week or two, or a full blown civil war lasting years. Hopefully not the latter.
27 posted on 01/11/2004 10:36:06 PM PST by John H K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: goody2shooz
I hate to think of that.......might depend on whether the U.S. decides to step in and lend a hand....?
28 posted on 01/12/2004 7:36:25 AM PST by nuconvert ("This wasn't just plain terrible, this was fancy terrible. This was terrible with raisins in it. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: freedom44
Excellent!

Although it would be much better if they would just do it immediately, rather than threaten to do it; and if they're going to threaten to do it they should demand more concessions from the mullahs, not just the reversal of the council's electoral decisions.

How about the parliament? Are any members there threatening to resign? Khatami will never regain the confidence of the real reformers (the ones in the street, who've already given up on him) unless he either gets some real gains out of this crisis, or resigns.

29 posted on 01/12/2004 11:48:17 AM PST by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedom44
I'd prefer the Hard-liners not to budge, it will kill off the reform movement within the government

Agreed. This is what needs to happen. The "reform" movement, and the whole false facade of a democratic government with which the mullahs supposedly share power, simply acts internally as a buffer between the tyranny of the mullahs and the people, and externally as a means of acquiring diplomatic legitimacy, aid and foreign investment.

Mass resignations and the effective collapse of the "democratic" government is the best thing that could happen now. Clarity if better than pretense.

Presumably the mullahs would react by filling the "elected" government with corrupt and subservient hacks, which will only increase the anger of the people and broaden the base of the protesters.

The mullahs actually need the putative malcontents -- the so-called "reformers" -- there to prevent the public at large from falling behind the students and other anti-mullah activists. Naturally most Iranians wish to be spared the potential chaos and danger of revolution. As long as it's possible to believe that there is an evolutionary process in place (the "reform" movement) then most Iranians will hold back from throwing in their lot with the radical "pro-democracy" forces. It's time to eliminate this diversionary fiction.

30 posted on 01/12/2004 12:12:45 PM PST by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: freedom44
The council has drawn lines in the sand and now finds itself in a box.
31 posted on 01/12/2004 12:14:44 PM PST by bert (Have you offended a liberal today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson