Skip to comments.
Optical illusion . . . or . . . Photo evidence of ancient Martian receding lake level?
NASA,JPL & pharmerphil's Photoshop 6 ^
| 1-11-2004
| Phil V. & Socks C.
Posted on 01/11/2004 1:03:15 PM PST by Phil V.
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-122 next last
Comment #41 Removed by Moderator
Comment #42 Removed by Moderator
To: Phil V.
According to whom? Just curious as to what your background in thermodynamics or incompressible flow is that allows you to make such a statement....
43
posted on
01/11/2004 3:21:39 PM PST
by
jnarcus
To: jnarcus
Which statement of mine gives you heartburn?
44
posted on
01/11/2004 3:26:32 PM PST
by
Phil V.
To: BushCountry
Did you happen to notice the crushed marlboro wrapper in the upper lefthand corner.
45
posted on
01/11/2004 3:27:02 PM PST
by
brooklin
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
a time shift between the photos The light source would change direction, the shadows would move. Right? I would go with a kind of Moire effect.
46
posted on
01/11/2004 3:36:02 PM PST
by
RightWhale
(How many technological objections will be raised?)
To: RightWhale
I'm having difficulty "seeing" the ability of wind to sort stones at different elevations.
But another guess/explanation would be that we are looking at multiple strata laid down over the ages and wind or water has eroded/removed material revealing strata of different composition and ages.
47
posted on
01/11/2004 3:48:42 PM PST
by
Phil V.
To: Phil V.
Strata due to seasonal effects are clearly visible in images of the polar caps. The thought on this basin is that it was flooded once. There wouldn't be much left of mud strata due to gradual drying up, it all happened at least millions of years ago and wind erosion would have smoothed the edges. It might be that some of the spectral sensors could pick up vestiges of the structure if it exists. If the pebbles retain some of the contour structure it would be much more subtle; maybe a computer analysis could pick it up once the terrain is mapped sufficiently. It would be too subtle for a stereo snapshot.
48
posted on
01/11/2004 4:01:12 PM PST
by
RightWhale
(How many technological objections will be raised?)
To: RightWhale
My thoughts on the mud/sand strata . . . The "lake" was not filled in a one-time-event. There was a wet period on Mars that provided this lake with multiple recharges of water laden with silt creating multiple strata. At the same time Mars is constantly bombarded with meteors impacting from all angles and with varying degrees of "explosiveness" showering rock fragments onto/into the lake and embeding gradually in the accumulating mud floor.
How 'bout dem apples?
49
posted on
01/11/2004 4:15:24 PM PST
by
Phil V.
To: Phil V.
I am hoping they find permafrost not far down under the dry layer. How far will this rover dig? A later rover will have a drill for coring to a fair depth.
BTW, apparently the Rover is the power source for the platform, and when the Rover disconnects tomorrow, the platform will become inert.
50
posted on
01/11/2004 4:20:03 PM PST
by
RightWhale
(How many technological objections will be raised?)
To: Phil V.
I noticed this too. West of Big Spring,Texas there is a similar surface feature on Interstate 20 before you get to Stanton, Texas. These dry lake beds stay hard and crusted over most of the time but like out in California at Edwards AFB water rises at night fall and the desert heat dries it up during the day. When it is very wet small shallow lakes stay there. I have found Selenite Gypsum Flowers that forms in the brackish water some 8-10 inches in diameter that are transparent! This was exactly my thought as you have indicated as well! These lakes have all types of fossils scattered about that I have collected as well.
51
posted on
01/11/2004 4:37:01 PM PST
by
winker
To: RightWhale
I am hoping they find permafrost not far down under the dry layer. AHhh . . . That's another angle!
Frost heave could possibly have created this pattern?
52
posted on
01/11/2004 4:39:17 PM PST
by
Phil V.
To: BushCountry
53
posted on
01/11/2004 4:41:48 PM PST
by
aruanan
To: Phil V.
It's a lake bed of course. Don't you see the lakehouses in the background? (About one-quarter of the way down and one-quarter to the right, two identical houses up to the roofs in dust.)
To: Phil V.
I think it looks like wheel marks from the rover going in a circle. Perhaps it is from ancient Martian stock cars?
55
posted on
01/11/2004 5:20:42 PM PST
by
glorgau
To: Graymatter
What would bounce inpressions look like. We should see some.
56
posted on
01/11/2004 5:26:21 PM PST
by
furball4paws
(Never less alone than when wholely alone; never less idle than when wholely idle.)
To: furball4paws
What would bounce inpressions look like. We should see some. I'd say that there's a "reasonable chance" that this very same picture has captured a bounce impression . . . dark splotch left side . . .
57
posted on
01/11/2004 5:43:49 PM PST
by
Phil V.
To: glorgau
The rover is not yet on the surface brodying around.
58
posted on
01/11/2004 5:51:18 PM PST
by
Phil V.
To: Phil V.
The two images are slightly offset. If you put one on top of another in Photoshop and then slide the opacity slider, you can see it.
To: Phil V.
I know I'm dealing with some "sharp" dudes here, but how about a collapse of the surface caused by an internal force or a meteor hit??
I'm a "old" female...be kind!!
60
posted on
01/11/2004 6:24:43 PM PST
by
Sacajaweau
(God Bless Our Troops!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-122 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson