Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Spirit Finds Possible Evidence of Water on Mars
Voice of America ^ | 1/9/04 | David McAlary

Posted on 01/09/2004 5:45:17 PM PST by LibWhacker

Less than a week after landing on Mars, the U.S. Spirit spacecraft has found possible evidence that water once flowed on the now-barren planet, the goal of the mission. The scientists are cautious about their interpretation.

Although the Spirit robotic rover has not yet begun its trek over Martian terrain, one of its scientific instruments has remotely detected small amounts of a mineral in nearby soil that hint of ancient water.

The instrument that did this is an infrared camera designed to sense the composition of material from afar by measuring heat emissions.

Mars mission scientist Phil Christensen says the presence of the mineral, called carbonate, might mean its is a remnant of rocks that formed in water from dissolved carbonate particles.

"So it might be that this carbonate actually does indeed have to do with the water that we came to look for," he said.

But Mr. Christensen warns that the mineral does not necessarily mean the landing site called Gusev Crater was an ancient lake, as is believed. The carbonate could have come from atmospheric dust that interacted with rocks and soil without water present.

The six-wheeled robotic explorer will help them determine the answer by examining rocks and soil closely when it eventually departs the Spirit lander. The nature of the soil in which the carbonate is found will reveal a lot.

Cornell University researcher Steven Squyres says if it is in wind-blown dust, it probably came from elsewhere and says nothing about a watery past for Gusev Crater. But if the soil that contains carbonate is coarse, like water sediments, that is evidence that the crater is an ancient lake bed.

"I think we're going to be chasing this carbonate story [for] weeks, months maybe," he said. "What we can do as we start to head out across the countryside is we can look at different patches of soil and we can measure the carbonate abundance is different kinds of soil."

The rover's expedition to do this has been delayed because airbags that cushioned the landing cannot be fully retracted and continue to block its path down Spirit's front ramp. To get around this obstacle, engineers have decided to rotate the lander one-third of a turn to the right and roll it off a secondary ramp on the lander's side late next week.

Steven Squyres says his team is prepared to command the rover to dig with its mechanical arm in whatever direction it heads.

"We always knew that we could egress in any direction and that the egress direction was going to be picked on the basis of safety," he said. "That's part of why we make sure to get a full 360 degree panoramic view. So we're going to be ready to pick targets, ready to do science no matter which direction the egress turns out to be."

In preparation for dispatching the rover, engineers have begun to raise it from its compressed travel position, as if it were a newborn stretching and kicking. The process of expanding the vehicle's legs and wheels to their fully extended position is taking two days.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: jpl; mars; nasa; space; spirit; water
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-116 next last
To: bolobaby
"Space is the key resource that we lack."

The South Pole is slightly less hostile an environment than is Mars by a ratio of 1,000,000-1. If the penguins don't cramp your style, what about that God-forsaken place??

And by the time you or any of the Trekkies here buy a "homesite" on Mars, the Earth as we know it will have been blown to smithereens during the prophesied Armeggedon scenario...

For now, you may want to check out Siberia or The Yukon. A RE/MAX or Century 21 real estate agent may be able to help you out.

21 posted on 01/09/2004 6:16:17 PM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Hey, how did you get that picture of the U joints and struts on my car?
22 posted on 01/09/2004 6:17:22 PM PST by Johnny_Cipher ("... and twenty thousand bucks to complete my robot. My GIRL robot.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Johnny_Cipher
All I want to know is . . . Did those geniuses at NASA think to put mud flaps on the rover? I'm looking forward to the live footage and I'd hate to be peering around a big glob of mud smack dab in the middle of the camera lens the whole time!
23 posted on 01/09/2004 6:25:57 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Johnny_Cipher
Too bad Mars isn't as habitable as Earth. We could move there, and let the liberals stay here on Mother Gaia (and ultimately starve without the productive class to feed them). We'd have to develop a system to shoot down any of their approaching spacecraft to keep their ideas out of our culture. We'd also have to add a couple of clauses to the Constitution, just for insurance:

No part of this Constitution shall be construed to mean in any way that the legislature, the executive, nor the judiciary shall be allowed or entitled in any way, for any reason, to re-distribute the wealth of one party or group to another group, irrespective of perceived or real disparities. The right to own property shall mean that NO ONE has a right to take it away from you, especially the government.

The Second Amendment shall be construed as to mean that you HAVE to own a gun, unless you're mentally ill, mentally defective, or a criminal. NO OTHER EXCEPTIONS ARE PERMISSIBLE. Being determined to be liberal shall not be construed as a mental defect, common sense to the contrary.

No legislator shall serve more than twelve years in the Federal government in any branch. No exceptions will be allowed, and no changes to this rule are allowed.

Ex Post Facto laws and bills of attainder really are illegal, just to remind any moron legislator or Supreme Court judge who can't understand the original text.

Freedom of speech means exactly that. Nobody can shout "Fire!" in a crowded theater. No other exceptions to this rule are allowed, period, no matter how good the intent. We'll call this one the McCain Mutiny amendment.

Gee, with radical thoughts like these, in print, I can almost hear the Gestapo at my door, wondering where I got these dangerous, destructive ideas.

24 posted on 01/09/2004 6:26:31 PM PST by Hardastarboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
I think it is short-sighted to not realize that mankind will one day extend its borders beyond earth.

The U.S. has a head start when it comes to space technology. Other countries are racing to catch up, though. It seems a shame to squander our lead on what will be - clearly - the most valuable commodity of the future.
25 posted on 01/09/2004 6:30:59 PM PST by bolobaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Did those geniuses at NASA think to put mud flaps on the rover?

I know the Lunar Rover carried during some of the Apollo missions had fenders. From the pictures of the Mars rover I've seen, I'm not sure if it has fenders or not. And yes, it would be A Bad Thing if a big glob of Martian gunk smacked right into the camera's lens.

26 posted on 01/09/2004 6:32:17 PM PST by Johnny_Cipher ("... and twenty thousand bucks to complete my robot. My GIRL robot.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
I'm not a scientist and haven't followed this mission closely, but wonder if they have measured background radiation and the composition of gases in the atmosphere to see if the planet is inhabitable without having to create a totally artificial environment.
27 posted on 01/09/2004 6:35:49 PM PST by TiaS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
Oh... and... the first sailing ships didn't make it all the way to America. Only successive voyages and improved navigation technology allowed settlers to arrive here.

It's a process of steps - each step as important as the Wright brothers first flight.

As for short term benefits, consider the fact that space is already a hot commodity because of communication needs. Unfortunately, many satellites are being put into orbit by other countries these days. If we develop cheap technology to lift payloads off the ground, it'll be a boon to the U.S. Moreso if we deregulate a bit...

Finally, there are many theories that support the idea that Mars could be terraformed into a habitable climate. Absolutely none of these are tested becaue we lack the data, but that's what missions like Spirit are for.
28 posted on 01/09/2004 6:39:59 PM PST by bolobaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Weren't there also spiders on Mars? I thought David Bowie discovered some a few years back!
29 posted on 01/09/2004 6:43:45 PM PST by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
Looking at this from the vantage point of Fairbanks, we're not so far from ready right now.
30 posted on 01/09/2004 6:46:22 PM PST by RightWhale (How many technological objections will be raised?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: TiaS
Yes, they have. As I understand it, it's totally uninhabitable by any form of life we know about, even bacteria. Radiation would kill any of earth's bacteria and even our astronauts couldn't remain very long, particularly if there was much solar activity (flares, etc.) while they were there. The atmosphere is very tenuous. Outside your spacesuit, you'd die almost as quickly as you would in a vacuum, the pressure is so low. And on earth, 20% of the atmosphere is oxygen. On Mars it's something like one ten thousandth of one percent.
31 posted on 01/09/2004 6:47:22 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Drammach
There seems to be conflicting information about the temperature at the landing site. The day of the landing I read that it was -90 C, but today there was an article that claimed surface temperatures of -15 C to +5 C.

If this is true, then perhaps it is water.

32 posted on 01/09/2004 6:51:46 PM PST by e_engineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
There's a fine article about terraforming Mars here. The article claims it would take millennia to do it.
33 posted on 01/09/2004 6:53:55 PM PST by Johnny_Cipher ("... and twenty thousand bucks to complete my robot. My GIRL robot.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Actually, that'd be Mexicola, the new drink that's about to hit shelves in California.
34 posted on 01/09/2004 6:54:51 PM PST by kingu (Remember: Politicians and members of the press are going to read what you write today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Exactly. Space is the key resource that we lack.

Ever drive from Palm Springs to Needles CA, on a back road. Talk about space......

35 posted on 01/09/2004 6:55:44 PM PST by itsahoot (The lesser of two evils, is evil still...Alan Keyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
It's not hard vacuum like the moon. You would get by in a high-altitude jet pilot's suit and breating mask for a while. It's not instant death. Even a total hard vacuum isn't instant death. You won't explode, your eyes won't pop out of your head. Radiation danger is vastly overrated. Meteorite danger is zilch. People can live there once they get camp set up.
36 posted on 01/09/2004 6:57:32 PM PST by RightWhale (How many technological objections will be raised?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
The carbonate could have come from atmospheric dust
that interacted with rocks and soil without water present.
37 posted on 01/09/2004 6:57:49 PM PST by DefCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Johnny_Cipher
There's a fine article about terraforming Mars here. The article claims it would take millennia to do it.

Based on the technology we are aware of and what we know now. In 100 years, we may look at Mars and say - "Terraform? That'll take 10 years."

It's along the lines of that Michael Crichton speech...

38 posted on 01/09/2004 6:58:44 PM PST by bolobaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
I'm bustin' a gut to find out what those black spots are at the bottom of the depression in the upper left of this photo are...


39 posted on 01/09/2004 6:58:48 PM PST by TommyUdo (The Democrat Party--Proudly Pimpin' off Po' Folk Since 1964)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bolobaby
"The U.S. has a head start when it comes to space technology"

Why does everyone think it's a nation-state race? That's part of the collective thinking hopefully the exponential increase in liveable space could rescue individualism from, like when people talk of an American economy versus a British one. That economy is driven by individuals from each that work creatively and productively for profits. Anyone who keeps score sees that private initiatives produce more results than top-down government administered bureaucracies, so why is it "different" with NASA?

Somehow I think Anderson's vision of private firms advancing spacefaring is more sensible than Bush's bold national vision. But he's been pretty visionary with my taxes for awhile now. When does the conservatism-part begin?

40 posted on 01/09/2004 7:01:06 PM PST by kcar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-116 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson