Why yes I can. It's a written account by the guy who did the creation. However you've already rejected it as hooey. So I guess you're looking for ANOTHER documented example.
Or, are you saying that no new organism have been created since the Earth was created, as documented in the book of Genesis?
BTW, your strawman that creationists believe nothing new has occurred since the original creation is really quite annoying. Adaptability and change WITHIN a species is well documented. New species suddenly appearing via mutation or evolution has no documentation however. There is no contradiction here. We are well designed, obviously, and can adapt to the parameters we can expect to face on this planet.
If you can remove the emotion and observe your own body and all of life on this planet, it is painfully obvious that there is a designer. To credit random chance for what is observable takes far greater faith than Creationism. Evolution denies logic and well-established scientific principles. (e.g. the notion that a more complex and organized state can spontaneously arise from a less organized state without intervention.) For that matter, why would SEXUAL reproduction make sense from an evolutionary standpoint, hmmn? Much more elegant and efficient to stay at the one cell self-replication, wouldn't you say?
Straw-man?
Did you never listened to the scientific debates when Darwin released his new theory upon the world? Before Darwin, it was KNOWN that it was impossible for an organism to change over time.
Sorry Sir, this has been the debate. When evolution has been well proved with rapidly reproducing organism (such as bacteria), then your side tries to re-define the terms.
Yes or No?
Are all organisms static since the time of Genesis, or have they changed over time?