Straw-man?
Did you never listened to the scientific debates when Darwin released his new theory upon the world? Before Darwin, it was KNOWN that it was impossible for an organism to change over time.
Sorry Sir, this has been the debate. When evolution has been well proved with rapidly reproducing organism (such as bacteria), then your side tries to re-define the terms.
Yes or No?
Are all organisms static since the time of Genesis, or have they changed over time?
Did you even read my post sir?
For the record you responded to:
Adaptability and change WITHIN a species is well documented. New species suddenly appearing via mutation or evolution has no documentation however. There is no contradiction here.
No new species have appeared. Existing species changed within their design parameters.
If you disagree, I would like you to point out, documented of course, a new species appearing.
We have evidence that a species "appears" in the geologic record with no links to a "transitional" animal. Hmmn. Why is that? Did the Evolution god "create" the new species with a burst of creativity? Why are there no fossils of a 'tweener? Shouldn't someone be able to produce a scrap of evidence for this notion that species don't just appear on the scene complete and fully functional? Shouldn't we be discovering the mistakes too?
BTW, frauds don't count. There are lots of so called 'hominid' fossils cobbled together from fragments scattered over many square miles. What happened? Did great-grampa ape step on a landmine? There are more pieces of interpretive plaster holding the chips together than bone fossil. Gotta love the artist rendering of how the little guy woulda looked too....