Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Holly_P
The sadder reality is that President Bush will not receive any political benefit from doing the right thing. Increasing timber production may save a few jobs in the timber industry, but those jobs don't compare to the number of votes controlled by pencil-pushers in the cities who couldn't care less about jobs in the timber industry. As far as the pencil-pushers are concerned, the timber workers can give up the nice pay and benefits of their current jobs and become telemarketers.

Resolving for 2004
Bill

8 posted on 01/04/2004 1:00:33 PM PST by WFTR (Liberty isn't for cowards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: WFTR
Bush could strike a compromise and turn the forests over to the states as they see fit. I question whether the Federales have any Constitutional jurisdiction over federal lands within a state other than for roads, and military bases. Clinton didn't have any problem reserving lands for national monuments without congressional action. Just reserve a monument for each state and let them take care of it.
9 posted on 01/04/2004 1:52:02 PM PST by meenie (Remember the Alamo! Alamo! One more time. Alamo!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: WFTR
The voters holding those timber-related jobs vote Democrat. I know. I live in a town literally dependent upon timber harvesting. A great many are out of work and stupidly continue to vote for Democrats.
11 posted on 01/04/2004 2:21:56 PM PST by goody2shooz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson