Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA Rover Sends Photos Back From Mars
AP ^ | Jan 04, 2004 | ANDREW BRIDGES

Posted on 01/04/2004 12:23:04 AM PST by optimistically_conservative

By ANDREW BRIDGES, AP Science Writer

PASADENA, Calif. - A NASA (news - web sites) rover plunged through the atmosphere of Mars and bounced down upon its rocky surface Saturday night, beginning a mission to roam the Red Planet in search of evidence that it was once suitable for life.

Photo
AP Photo

Reuters Photo
Slideshow


(AP Video)

 

Scientists at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory let out whoops of joy and embraced one another as signals from the Spirit rover indicated it had survived the landing.

Within hours it began sending back photos of the Red Planet. Among the first was a tiny black and white image showing a sundial on the rover. Another showed the Martian horizon and portions of the lander.

"This is a big night for NASA — we are back!" NASA administrator Sean O'Keefe crowed at a celebratory news conference, relishing a success after a difficult year that included the agency's Feb. 1 Columbia space shuttle disaster.

"I'm very, very proud of this team and we're on Mars. It's an absolutely incredible accomplishment," O'Keefe said. He then toasted the mission's members with champagne he said he had been saving for more than 20 years.

The spacecraft landed upright Saturday night, which made it easy for the four-petaled lander that contains the rover to unfold, allowing it to take photographs, said Chris Jones, director of planetary flight programs at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory.

The photographs, zipped to Earth across 106 million miles of space, showed a flat landscape peppered with rocks.

"This just keeps getting better and better. The pictures are fantastic," said mission science manager John Callas.

Spirit is one of two-identical six-wheeled robots expected to roam the planet for 90 days, analyzing Martian rocks and soil for clues that could reveal whether the planet was ever a warmer, wetter place capable of sustaining life.

Mission officials said the rover won't trundle off on its own for another nine days.

The rover relied on a heat shield, parachute and rockets to slow its descent to Mars. It touched down inside Gusev Crater, a Connecticut-sized indentation just south of the Martian equator. Eight seconds before landing, a giant set of air bags inflated to cushion its bouncy landing.

"This is essentially perfect navigation. We couldn't have possibly hoped to do better than this," navigation team chief Louis D'Amario said.

Previously, about two of every three attempts to land spacecraft on Mars have failed. The latest apparent failure was the British Beagle 2 lander, which has not been heard from since it was to have set down on Mars on Christmas.

"It's an incredibly difficult place to land. Some have called it the 'death planet' for good reason," said Ed Weiler, NASA's associate administrator for space science.

NASA's last attempt at landing on Mars, in 1999, failed when a software glitch sent the Polar Lander crashing to the ground. Since then, the space agency has increased oversight of its missions.

The $820 million NASA project also includes a twin rover, Opportunity, which is set to arrive on Mars on Jan. 24.

Today, Mars is a dry and cold world. But ancient river channels and other water-carved features spied from orbit suggest that Mars may have had a more hospitable past.

 

"We see these intriguing hints Mars may have been a different place long ago," said Steve Squyres, the mission's main scientist.

The rovers were built to look for evidence that liquid water — a necessary ingredient for life — once persisted on the surface of the planet. A direct search for life on Mars is at least a decade away, NASA scientists said.

Together, the robots were launched in the most intensive scientific assault on another planetary body since the Apollo missions to the moon, said Orlando Figueroa, director of NASA's Mars exploration program.

NASA launched the 384-pound Spirit and its twin in hopes they would become the fourth and fifth U.S. spacecraft to survive landing on Mars. Twenty other spacecraft from various nations have failed.

Scientists are taking advantage of the closest approach Mars has made to Earth in 60,000 years. NASA intends to send spacecraft to Mars at regular 26-month intervals, or each time the Earth laps the Red Planet as they both circle the sun.

The highly anticipated Spirit landing follows another important American space mission. On Friday, a NASA spacecraft flew through the bright halo of a distant comet to scoop up nearly a thimbleful of dust that could shed light on how the solar system was formed.

___

On the Net: http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/home/index.html


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: jpl; mars; nasa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Click for Large Photo


  Email this slideshow

A journalist watches a television monitor as NASA (news - web sites) personnel at the space agency's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California view the first images transmitted from the Mars Exploration Rover 'Spirit' January 3, 2004. Spirit, one of two mobile laboratories, arrived on the planet earlier in the evening to conduct geological field work. REUTERS/Robert Galbraith

1 posted on 01/04/2004 12:23:04 AM PST by optimistically_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
Rank Location Receipts Donors/Avg Freepers/Avg Monthlies
44 Wyoming 20.00
1
20.00
26
0.77
30.00
1

Thanks for donating to Free Republic!

Move your locale up the leaderboard!

2 posted on 01/04/2004 12:23:34 AM PST by Support Free Republic (Hi Mom! Hi Dad!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
ping
3 posted on 01/04/2004 12:25:20 AM PST by farmfriend ( Isaiah 55:10,11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: optimistically_conservative
Hey, I recognize that scenery!. It's in a National Park in Utah.
4 posted on 01/04/2004 1:03:09 AM PST by BenLurkin (Socialism is Slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: optimistically_conservative
NASA's last attempt at landing on Mars, in 1999, failed when a software glitch sent
the Polar Lander crashing to the ground.


That Political-Correctness-Speak for:
"NASA wasted MILLIONS of YOUR DOLLARS when they failed to do the sort of
'dimensional analysis' in their calculations...switching miles and kilometers in the calculations...thus assuring
that the space probe would crash into the red planet."

The sort of mistake that a high school physics or chemistry student would get
no credit (an "F") for doing.

Of course, as far as I heard, nobody at NASA was fired for this monumental stupidity.
5 posted on 01/04/2004 1:13:40 AM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Hey, I recognize that scenery!. It's in a National Park in Utah.

Don't be silly.

It's a movie set in LA.

6 posted on 01/04/2004 1:15:38 AM PST by Drango (Democratic fund raising....If PBS won't do it, who will?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: optimistically_conservative
Scientists are taking advantage of the closest approach Mars has made to Earth in
60,000 years. NASA intends to send spacecraft to Mars at regular 26-month intervals,
or each time the Earth laps the Red Planet as they both circle the sun.


Translation:
While some NASA workers are truly motivated by the spirit of discovery...
some are driven to spend tax dollars at finding any sort of trace of "life" on Mars
in order to get a Nobel Prize at proof of extra-terrestrial life...
and then proceed to yammer about how this "disproves" the Judeo-Christian view of life
and makes Darwin the Overlord of Life.

I'm all for the exploration...and suspicion of the motives of some of the participants
at the same time.
7 posted on 01/04/2004 1:19:00 AM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend; optimistically_conservative
Major thread over here:

Mars Exploration Rover Mission

8 posted on 01/04/2004 1:29:03 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Davis is now out of Arnoold's Office , Bout Time!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: VOA
While some NASA workers are truly motivated by the spirit of discovery... some are driven to spend tax dollars at finding any sort of trace of "life" on Mars in order to get a Nobel Prize at proof of extra-terrestrial life... and then proceed to yammer about how this "disproves" the Judeo-Christian view of life and makes Darwin the Overlord of Life.

The US achieves another stunning technological success, and all you can think of to say is to exercise your persecution complex.

And for the record, I've participated in countless creation/evolution debates over the past 20 years, and know more scientists than I could even start to count -- and not once, ever, have I encountered the sort of madcap conspiracy motivations you fantasize. You're a lot more obsessed with the alleged "Darwin over religion" concept than any scientist I've ever known, met, or read the works of.

"Darwin the Overlord of Life"? Which Jack Chick comic did you borrow *that* one from?

You remind me of the hypersensitive minority individuals who see everything as "designed by the Man to keep us down, Brother". Meanwhile, 99% of the time, that notion never even crossed the mind of "the Man" being accused.

You know, the decaffeinated brands taste just as good.

9 posted on 01/04/2004 1:33:47 AM PST by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

One of the first images taken by the Mars Exploration Rover mission is pictured on a television monitor at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory after the Mars rover landed on Mars January 3, 2004. The rover will explore the surface of the planet. REUTERS/NASA /HO Reuters - Jan 04 4:15 AM "

10 posted on 01/04/2004 1:42:53 AM PST by KneelBeforeZod (If God hadn't meant for them to be sheared, he wouldn't have made them sheep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon
The US achieves another stunning technological success, and all you can think of to say
is to exercise your persecution complex.


Hey, I am appreciative of the Mars projects (as long as NASA remembers the conept of
dimensional analysis).
These projects should send messages to folks like Saddam, et al.
If we can land a non-manned probe that we can remotely control and get intelligence
(photos and chemical info) from at the distance of Mars...they should have understood
we won't have problems pulling off intelligence-gathering exercises
from Afghanistan and/or Iraq.

Persecution project? LOL! I just want the projects to work in terms of a science project.
I helped to pay for them!
And in our Hyde Park, I simply hold my own opinion about the agenda held by
some who promote these projects.
11 posted on 01/04/2004 1:48:58 AM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: VOA
The cost is well justified if you consider how these pictures will confuse Sheila Lee Jackson.
12 posted on 01/04/2004 2:20:30 AM PST by monocle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: VOA
You're thinking of a different craft. The polar lander crashed because its internal sensors mistook the vibrations of the landing gear deployment for the vibrations it expected upon touchdown. As a consequence, the engines shut off prematurely and the orbiter crashed.

See http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/database/MasterCatalog?sc=1999-001A for more details.

The lost probe to which you refer was the Mars Climate Observer. It was lost not because of distance conversion miscalculations, but thrust miscalculations during the course of orbital insertion.

So please make sure you have the facts straight when issuing such blanket condemnations.

Besides, if NASA were truly comprised of the caliber of morons you think they must have, we wouldn't be celebrating this latest and greatest success.

13 posted on 01/04/2004 2:22:48 AM PST by Prime Choice (Americans are a spiritual people. We're happy to help members of al Qaeda meet God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: VOA
Of course, as far as I heard, nobody at NASA was fired for this monumental stupidity.

You wouldn't have heard about said termination even if it occurred. It's none of the public's business if a private individual is reprimanded or released from his position.

NASA's a fine outfit. Sure, there's always a select number of folks who screw up royally here and there. Show me any comparably-advanced technical organization that doesn't have any such people.

14 posted on 01/04/2004 2:28:53 AM PST by Prime Choice (Americans are a spiritual people. We're happy to help members of al Qaeda meet God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
"I grew up on Mars. My father was a Martian Senator" Al Gore
15 posted on 01/04/2004 2:38:17 AM PST by stocksthatgoup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: stocksthatgoup
"I grew up on Mars. My father was a Martian Senator" Al Gore"

That is not a true statement. Men are from Mars and Al Gore is no man.

16 posted on 01/04/2004 2:43:42 AM PST by bd476 (Happy New Year!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon
Obviously you haven't been paying attention on FR where iditorials have been posted telling us how the discovery of life on Mars will somehow "prove" that "mankind" isn't so special in the universe and somehow this means that God didn't architect anything. Atheists have already spouted this tripe in print this week. Not our fault if you missed it on FR.
17 posted on 01/04/2004 3:08:45 AM PST by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: optimistically_conservative
$820 million, 106 million miles of space, to find a rock and name it "Scooby doo". "Hey, there`s dirt and rocks on Mars. Whoa, just like last time! What are the chances that we would find that again!? Call the press!"
18 posted on 01/04/2004 3:10:34 AM PST by metalboy (Marshall Will and Holly, on a routine expedition, came upon the greatest earthquake ever known...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stocksthatgoup
"I grew up on Mars. My father was a Martian Senator" Al Gore

I knew Mars. I worked on Mars. Mr. Gore, you`re no Martian. (he`s a Uranuson)

19 posted on 01/04/2004 3:15:14 AM PST by metalboy (Marshall Will and Holly, on a routine expedition, came upon the greatest earthquake ever known...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: weegee
iditorials have been posted telling us how the discovery of life on Mars will somehow "prove" that "mankind" isn't so special in the universe and somehow this means that God didn't architect anything.

Feel free to provide a link to such items so I can see them for myself. Usually, though, when I ask for such examples, they turn out to be not as bad as advertised. People have a tendency to read into things what they expect to see.

20 posted on 01/04/2004 3:23:00 AM PST by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson