Posted on 12/31/2003 7:11:32 PM PST by kristinn
D.C. Fox affiliate WTTG-5 reported a few minutes ago that British Airways flight 223 has been detained on the tarmac at Dulles Airport, Virginia, just outside Washington, D.C.
The flight landed at 7:06 p.m. Passengers have not been allowed to deplane. Some family members waiting at the terminal were able to speak with some of the passengers via cellphone. They were told TSA and other security personnell are interviewing passengers and inspecting luggage.
Over two hundred passengers and crew are on the plane.
More to follow as reported. Please forgive any errors as this just caught my ear.
Possible. But why would they need the passengers to prove seat assignments? The airline assigns those.
NEW YORK TIMES
By ERIC LICHTBLAU
WASHINGTON, Dec. 31 —
The American authorities in the last week ordered a United States-bound flight from Mexico to turn around in midair and imposed extraordinary security measures on at least six other incoming flights because of terrorist concerns, federal officials said Wednesday.
Officials were so concerned about possible attacks on at least five foreign flights that landed in the United States, including one on Wednesday at Dulles International Airport outside Washington, that they moved the planes away from the main terminals and rescreened the passengers.
The security moves, along with the cancellation of several flights on Dec. 24 by Air France to Los Angeles, reflect an aggressive new approach toward guarding United States airspace because of concerns that terrorists may seek to hijack an international flight. The strategy is an outgrowth of the "high risk" terrorist alert status initiated 11 days ago.
While officials said they wanted to cooperate with other nations to strengthen security, they also said they were unwilling to let foreign flights into United States airspace without rigorous security checks.
This week, Tom Ridge, secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, put foreign airlines on notice that they would be denied entry to American airspace if they refused to put armed air marshals on any incoming flights of concern. The move, which met resistance from some countries, came less than a week after Air France canceled six flights because of American worries that terrorists might be aboard. The federal officials said that putting pressure on foreign carriers to use marshals was just one of several steps they were taking behind the scenes to meet rising concern about international flights.
The officials said that in the last week they also had "significantly increased" inspection of air cargo on foreign flights, a source of widespread concern as a potential mode of attack for terrorists.
Military F-16 fighter jets have also shadowed some foreign flights from Air France and other airlines arriving at major American cities, including Los Angeles, an administration official said.
And the federal officials disclosed Wednesday that after the Air France cancellations, they reached an agreement this week with a French delegation to impose tougher security requirements on flights that American officials suspect may be at risk.
A key provision, the officials said, was that the French agreed to give to United States officials passenger lists for any flights thought to be suspicious at least one hour before take-off, rather than waiting until the flight is in the air as is now normally done. American officials said they wanted to use that agreement as a model for ensuring tighter aviation security in other nations as well.
"What we're trying to do is establish protocols to be able to vet these passenger lists before the flight takes off, and that's in the interests of both parties," said an American official involved in the agreement. "No one wants to be told when a flight is halfway across the Atlantic that it has to turn around."
But American officials have shown a willingness to do just that in recent days if questions arise about a flight's security.
In the case of a foreign carrier's flight this week from Mexico, a Transportation Security Administration inspector based there told officials in the United States that passengers boarding a flight for the United States had not been properly screened, government officials said.
As one official related the exchanged that followed, American transportation officials told the airline, "You said there were procedures in place for that flight that weren't there. Turn it around."
The airline agreed to return the plane to Mexico and rescreen the passengers, and the American authorities allowed the flight to complete its scheduled route, the official said. Officials refused to disclose the city of origin or the itinerary for the flight, citing both diplomatic and national security concerns.
Since the Bush administration put the United States on high terrorist alert on Dec. 21, some flights have made it to the United States even amid concerns about their security, officials said.
In five or six flights coming to the United States from England, Mexico and elsewhere, officials said, there were concerns about lapses in security in the city of origin, intelligence about possible terrorist activity, and sometimes both. Officials said several suspect flights landed at the Los Angeles International Airport and another at Dulles, but they declined to provide details on the routes.
At Dulles airport, the police surrounded a British Airways flight that landed Wednesday evening, said Rachael Sunbarger, a spokeswoman from the Department of Homeland Security. Ms. Sunbarger could not confirm the flight number of the plane, its point of origin or its final destination.
"There is interest in that particular flight," Ms. Sunbarger said, but she would not elaborate on why it was detained.
In each of these cases, officials said, security officials met the planes and did what is called a "reverse screening," taking the planes to a remote site and requiring the passengers and luggage to undergo inspections and screening before the travelers went through customs. Passengers were also searched for explosives, weapons and other contraband.
Before the alert level was raised to orange, or high, such screenings for flights that had already landed were rare, a security official said.
"Clearly we're in a situation where this is happening much more frequently than in earlier periods," the official said. "There's a lot of concern, and these decisions are being tracked at the highest levels" of the domestic security system.
In another instance several days ago, a flight headed for the United States from Latin America was grounded on the runway for several hours after United States officials told the air carrier they were not satisfied that passengers had been adequately screened.
David O'Connor, director of the United States operations for the International Air Transport Association, a trade group that represents most international carriers, said one critical challenge facing the United States in seeking to strengthen air security was that safety standards vary so widely around the world.
"Some airports and airlines are very secure," he said. "The British, for example, have been concerned about terrorist attacks long before 9/11, and they screen passengers and baggage extensively. And in Germany, the same."
But he added, "when you're talking about developing nations in Latin America and elsewhere, many haven't until recently initiated any real screening procedures, and that's where you have problems."
_ _ _ _ _
Thank God they're being this vigilant .. now, for the borders and illegals.
sorry...couldn't resist
You said it. The ventilation systems only work when the plane is flying. I'd be busting out a window by now.
Another reason could be that they identified a particular passenger with a deadly, contagious disease (e.g., Ebola) and want to know who was seated nearby.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.