Gee, where have we heard THAT before? Campaign Finanace Reform? Looks like that plan failed there. Why on earth would you support that strategy once again?!?
If that happens, will you vote against your representative and senator as well?
Hell yes!
And exactly what would you have Bush do differently with regard to border control, keeping in mind the budget restrictions he has to work with?
Oh, gee, I don't know, how about enforcing the laws already in place with the officers who are paid to do so? Is that so difficult?
We do not live in a monarchy or dictatorship, so anything Bush wants to accomplish has to move through Congress. That means compromise at times.
Maybe so, but one does NOT conpromise on the [expletive deleted] Constitution or the Oath of Office!!!
And with regard to the fiscal conservatives, keep in mind that non-defense spending increases have been kept to 4%... not great, but a lot better than under any Democrat would have been.
CLINTON was better than that!!!
Add that to the tax cuts, PBA ban, dumping Kyoto and ABM treaties, his willingness to ignore the UN and defend the USA interests first - I am more than willing to give him another 4 years.
And weigh that against CFR (thereby allowing Sandy O to gut the first Amendment!!!), the biggest entitlement giveaway increase in 40 years (perscription drugs), a runaway budget (Teddy's Education bill?!?!?), Patriot Act (imagine how this potential expansion of powers can be wielded the first liberal Presidency), open borders (during a War on Terror, the best and easiest of all excuses, of all things!), etc. (On foreign policy, he's been great. It is domestically that he has been a huge headache.)
And by the way, PBA was NOT his doing. Mr. Never-Veto had nothing to do with the first 3 PBA bills that went to Clinton to get vetoed. That was in the works for years. He does not get extra credit simply for not vetoing it a foutrh time.
Simply amazing how delusional rationalization has affcted the unappeasable crowd.