Replies

There are those here that one could call "the unappeaseables"

My favorite term for the hyenas.

Richard Vigurie sticks his head up, every four years, to piss and moan about how Republicans are letting down "true conservatives."

There seems to be a concerted effort, now that Bush seems to be a near lock next year, for so-called "conservatives" to try to take him down.

At_war_with_Liberals is the chief organ grinder for a band of monkeys who have an active campaign going against Bush from the right.

Here. Read what jimkress, a knuckle-dragger with gelatinous excrement for brains has to say about Bush:

From this point on I will publicly oppose your position as President. I will actively work against your re-election attempt - due primarily to your decision to impose an untouchable political aristocracy upon your constituents. I will do all in my power to assure that neither you nor your progeny will ever again subvert and corrupt the freedom given us by God and protected by the blood of our citizens.

You have earned the enmity of all who love liberty and resist tyranny. You have made it clear you represent the same evil that gave the world Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot and Hitler. You have subverted liberty. You have imposed tyranny upon your constituents.

May God have mercy on your soul.

How's that for a so-called "conservative"? Kress is going to vote for Howard Phillips, a clown who's never held an elective office.

I guess you could call me "unappeasable" when the discussion is "which Constitution-ignorer shall we elect this time?" I have to continue to jump up and down and wave my tiny little arms and squeak: There are more important things that just getting your favorite person elected!! A million Americans have fought and died for those Founding principles, and it is sad that we must push so fervently for a President who allows them to be ignored for simple political expediency (CFR, the drug entitlement, and AWB being the most glaring examples of unnecessary and blatantly anti-Constitutional positions held/supported by President Bush).

Until we find a Presidential candidate that won't support such unimportant (would ANY of those EVER save lives or be needed in response to a national emergency?), useless (counter-productive, really), and (amazingly clearly) anti-Constitutional positions, I simply have to leave that spot blank on my ballot. I pray that his foreign policy genius finally comes back home to guide his domestic agenda. Until I see that it has, I can only hope, if the Dems take it in 2004 or 2008, that the GOP in the House and Senate stand strong. We've certainly given them the numbers to do it!!!