Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Methods Paying Off
Moscow Times ^ | Monday, Dec. 29, 2003 | Pavel Felgenhauer

Posted on 12/29/2003 5:01:19 PM PST by presidio9

2003 will primarily be remembered for the war in Iraq, the fall of Baghdad and the capture of Saddam Hussein. The U.S.-led invasion was strongly opposed by millions of Europeans and by former great powers France, Germany and Russia. But they protested in vain.

The U.S. march on Baghdad was a unique event in the history of modern warfare. The swiftness and zeal of the advancing armored columns, supported by relentless air power, is comparable to the best campaigns of the Israeli defense force. But the Israelis never achieved full victory; they did not manage or were not allowed by outside powers to occupy the entire territory of the opposing Arab nation.

Armed conflicts during the Cold War, when Russia and the West balanced each other globally, tended to be very bloody but strategically limited engagements: They were pitched battles on patches of disputed territory where the best possible outcome was to push the enemy back several kilometers and then fortify, awaiting a counteroffensive.

It was a time of frustrating tug-of-war conflicts in which clear and decisive victories were unachievable despite all the carnage. The 2003 campaign in Iraq, on the contrary, was a breath of fresh air for military history buffs -- almost like a return to Napoleonic times with the addition of modern military gear. This was a war that indeed achieved its goal of total enemy defeat and conquest.

Just before Christmas, a high-ranking French delegation of generals, admirals, defense industry officials and analysts came to Moscow. The French amazed their Russian counterparts by breaking to them something that is still news in Moscow today: The United States achieved a major victory in Afghanistan in 2001 and an even greater one in Iraq this year. Russian and French predictions of possible U.S. failure were totally off the mark, and today it would be wrong to expect a U.S. fiasco in suppressing the residual resistance in Iraq.

French and German leaders congratulated President George W. Bush with the capture of Hussein, while President Vladimir Putin remained silent. Die-hard antiwar Democrats like presidential hopeful Howard Dean, together with most Russians, still hope Bush will get a bloody nose in Iraq, but the reality of the situation on the ground does not lend support to this fantasy.

The vast majority of the Iraqi population does not support the resistance. On the contrary, as the guerrilla campaign has developed, the discretion in using force displayed by the Americans and the indiscretion in slaughtering innocent civilians of the jihadist resistance is effectively helping to win over hearts and minds. Today the United States is in a good position to achieve its ultimate goal: the installation of a pro-U.S. Iraqi authority equipped with a military, a police force and a cadre of informers that will keep the opposition down, while the United States will retain strategically important military bases in Iraq.

The Arab and Muslim world, despite many prophesies to the contrary and lots of agitation, did not rise as one to oppose the United States in Iraq. The majority of Iraqis and Arabs are waiting to see whether the United States will manage to make Iraq a better place to live than it was under Hussein. Everyone wants the Americans to hand over control to the locals eventually, but not immediately.

Extreme Islamists from abroad are helping pro-Hussein leftovers to resist in Iraq, but the resources of the jihadists are limited and stretched thin across many fronts: Fighting Israel, different Arab regimes, the Indian forces in Kashmir, the Russians in Chechnya, plotting terrorist attacks worldwide and so on. The jihadists surely cannot carry on a sustained Vietnam-like guerrilla war to chew up the U.S. military in Iraq.

Libyan dictator Moammar Gadhafi has weighed up the odds and decided to make a deal with Washington to surrender his weapons of mass destruction, rather than providing support to the Iraqi resistance. This year has been remarkable with two former rogue nations, Iraq and Libya, cleared of WMD and a third, Iran, signing a protocol that may prevent it going nuclear.

It has been proven that U.S. military force or the threat of force is an effective method of reversing the proliferation of WMD worldwide. Modern precision warfare also seems to be a more humane method of dealing with rogues than traditional decade-long suffocating sanctions. While the U.S. military continues to be effective, it will surely be much in use in the future.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Russia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2003review; arabworld; bushdoctrine; bushdoctrineunfold; ira; iraq; pavelfelgenhauer; worldopinion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

1 posted on 12/29/2003 5:01:19 PM PST by presidio9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: presidio9
That's it in a nutshell.
2 posted on 12/29/2003 5:03:52 PM PST by Argus (Happy Eid al Kwanzukkahmas, everybody!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
...the Israelis never achieved full victory; they did not manage or were not allowed by outside powers to occupy the entire territory of the opposing Arab nation.

Damn shame.

3 posted on 12/29/2003 5:04:31 PM PST by rickmichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
A nice look at the big picture. Thanks for the post.
4 posted on 12/29/2003 5:06:17 PM PST by microgood (They will all die......most of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Just before Christmas, a high-ranking French delegation of generals, admirals, defense industry officials and analysts came to Moscow.

And the prostitutes in Moscow were never busier.

5 posted on 12/29/2003 5:06:42 PM PST by rickmichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9; *Bush Doctrine Unfold; NormsRevenge; Grampa Dave; BOBTHENAILER; Ragtime Cowgirl; Dog
From Moscow!

Just Outstanding!
6 posted on 12/29/2003 5:07:15 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Davis is now out of Arnoold's Office , Bout Time!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dark Wing
ping
7 posted on 12/29/2003 5:07:43 PM PST by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Bada boom, bada bing. This is exactly the way it is. The Moscow Times got it right, why can't the NY Times????
8 posted on 12/29/2003 5:08:02 PM PST by numberonepal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: numberonepal
What a world this is that we ge more sanity and reality from Moscow than from the NYT.
9 posted on 12/29/2003 5:09:59 PM PST by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels
....Oh, but the question is "Did the girls get paid?"
10 posted on 12/29/2003 5:10:50 PM PST by pointsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Walk softly and carry a big stick.. Bump
11 posted on 12/29/2003 5:14:06 PM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; stands2reason; numberonepal
Die-hard antiwar Democrats like presidential hopeful Howard Dean, together with most Russians, still hope Bush will get a bloody nose in Iraq

I find it interesting that there are people in Moscow who see right through Howard Dean.

12 posted on 12/29/2003 5:14:16 PM PST by presidio9 (Hello America! Hello Freedom-man!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Modern precision warfare also seems to be a more humane method of dealing with rogues than traditional decade-long suffocating sanctions.
13 posted on 12/29/2003 5:14:35 PM PST by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Nice article. Dead on the mark, too. Moscow Times, eh? . . . Who is Pavel Felgenhauer? Never heard of him. A German journalist working in Russia perhaps?

14 posted on 12/29/2003 5:14:54 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
I don't know anything about him personally, but I have been aware of him for some time. Probably because of his unusual name.
15 posted on 12/29/2003 5:18:24 PM PST by presidio9 (Hello America! Hello Freedom-man!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: numberonepal
"The Moscow Times got it right, why can't the NY Times????"

You ask an excellent question!

16 posted on 12/29/2003 5:19:20 PM PST by Thom Pain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
An excellent analysis. It's amazing that it takes a member of the Russian press to express the situation so clearly. With greater distance comes greater objectivity, perhaps.
17 posted on 12/29/2003 5:23:40 PM PST by sourcery (This is your country. This is your country under socialism. Any questions? Just say no to Socialism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Wonder what the size of the cleaning bill was for the French and Russian military uniforms that were soiled from the inside? It had to be a big bill and a bigger cleaning task.

Wonder just how many mid grade Russian military personnel were asking the question; "And you wanted us to take the US on in a head to head fight? What were you NUTS?"
18 posted on 12/29/2003 5:33:24 PM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
"Modern precision warfare also seems to be a more humane method of dealing with rogues than traditional decade-long suffocating sanctions."

Absolutely. Sanctions are a modern form of siege warfare. And it's always the civilians who suffer most in siege warfare.
19 posted on 12/29/2003 5:33:45 PM PST by omega4412
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
"Just before Christmas, a high-ranking French delegation of generals, admirals, defense industry officials and analysts came to Moscow."

Friggin french!
20 posted on 12/29/2003 5:38:49 PM PST by SwinneySwitch ("When somone says he is going to kill you -- believe him" - Gamla)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson