Skip to comments.
Red Rover, Red Rover ....
U.S. Sending 2 Vehicles Over
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A37210-2003Dec28.html ^
Posted on 12/29/2003 4:10:06 PM PST by rs79bm
Edited on 12/29/2003 4:16:33 PM PST by Admin Moderator.
[history]

It looks like something you might build from a pile of junk. It has a clunky body balanced on six wheels, eyeball-like cameras, moving panels that look like insect wings and a long probe that reaches out to grab things.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: jpl; mars; nasa; opportunity; spirit
Freepmail me if you want on or/off my Sci/Tech ping list.
1
posted on
12/29/2003 4:10:07 PM PST
by
rs79bm
To: rs79bm
I'll be damned if that thing doesn't look like Number 5 from the movie "Short Circuit".
To: rs79bm
I wonder how much BMW or some car company would pay to stick their emblem on this and sholder some of the cost.
To: rs79bm
Little known facts:
The Rovers are programmed to land on opposite side of Mars.
4
posted on
12/29/2003 4:26:32 PM PST
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
Can a MER think for itself?
In a very limited way. The thing that we must trust it to do is to find its way through a field of obstacles. If you're down here on Earth and you want the rover to drive 30 meters to the northwest, ideally what I would like to do would be to move a joystick and steer [the rover] around the rocks, and go left and right and experience that in real time. You can't do that because Mars is so far away. It takes 10 minutes, traveling at the speed of light, before anything happens at the other end. So we've given the vehicle enough intelligence that we can trust it to make safe decisions on its own.
Such as?
We don't ask it to find the good rocks, we don't ask it to figure out how to reach the arm out and touch something all on its own -- those are very hard things to do for a robot. But we do ask it to be able to drive along and not get into trouble. The interesting thing is that you can program different levels of courage into this vehicle. It looks ahead to obstacles and says to itself, "Oh, that's small, I'm not afraid of that," or "Oh, that's big, I don't want to go near that." We can adjust how it sees, and make a rock look safe or scary, depending on how confident we are in the rover's ability to handle it. We will be very cautious at first. We might make it a little braver as time goes on.
5
posted on
12/29/2003 4:27:33 PM PST
by
rs79bm
(Insert Democratic principles and ideals here: .............this space intentionally left blank.....)
To: rs79bm
I'm holding my breath hoping the things deploy properly. After the unfortunate fate of the UK unit we just don't need another flop. I think I recall the the second will deploy by 1/25/04. Best of luck to the folks at Nasa.
To: Blue Screen of Death
"I wonder how much BMW or some car company would pay to stick their emblem on this and sholder some of the cost."
Not much given the relibility of most government projects. Be pretty embarrassing when it gets to Mars and someone remembers the key is back on earth.
7
posted on
12/29/2003 4:46:10 PM PST
by
monday
To: monday
Pizza Hut put their logo on a big booster a couple years ago for $1 million. Whatever's in the advertising budget.
8
posted on
12/29/2003 4:48:37 PM PST
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
To: Batrachian
"Number 5 Alive!"
9
posted on
12/29/2003 5:31:25 PM PST
by
FreedomFarmer
(Proudly raising the finest scorn for our liberal urban neighbors.)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson