Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wright replica fails to get off the ground
Washington Times ^ | Thursday, December 18, 2003 | By Joseph Curl

Posted on 12/17/2003 10:17:25 PM PST by JohnHuang2

Edited on 07/12/2004 4:11:10 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

KILL DEVIL HILLS, N.C. -- One hundred years to the day after Orville and Wilbur Wright soared into history on man's first powered flight, modern-day aviators sought to duplicate the feat, with a little help from 21st-century technology and supercomputers.

They flopped badly.


(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: wrightbrothers
Thursday, December 18, 2003

Quote of the Day by MissAmericanPie

1 posted on 12/17/2003 10:17:25 PM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Wright replica fails to get off the ground

Does this mean we have to start over?

2 posted on 12/17/2003 11:00:37 PM PST by ALASKA (That's my own personal, correct, opinion and I'm sticking with it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2; Molly Pitcher
Using a crew of Wright ancestors

Why is it that people can't figure out the difference between ancestors and descendants (mentioned later in the sentence)?

3 posted on 12/17/2003 11:12:25 PM PST by lepton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Most modern airplane designs are aerodynamically stable. The Wright Brothers' Flyer isn't. Although the Flyer's instability probably makes it much harder to fly than its modern counterparts, it does have a decided advantage. A modern aircraft which stalls will fall into a descent pattern where it will pick up airspeed until either (1) it has enough airspeed to fly again, or (2) the ground gets in the way. Unfortunately, hitting the ground with a rate of descent nearly equal to flight speed is not apt to be very good for an aircraft or its pilot. By contrast, the Wright Brothers' design will fall into a descent pattern in which the plain does not pick up much airspeed. This means that in case of a stall the plane won't be able to recover, but it also means the pilot and plane are likely to end up in one piece.
4 posted on 12/18/2003 12:06:09 AM PST by supercat (Why is it that the more "gun safety" laws are passed, the less safe my guns seem?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson