1 posted on
12/15/2003 7:14:29 AM PST by
SJackson
To: SJackson
Sorry Walter. Can't hear you over the cheering.
2 posted on
12/15/2003 7:16:39 AM PST by
HarleyD
(Bilbo, "When Sting turns blue it signals a RAT is near.")
To: SJackson
What a bunch of losers! if Carter, Mondale and Brezinski were calling the shots we'd have given up on 9-11 and begged Bin Laden to forgive us. I loathe these jackals.
4 posted on
12/15/2003 7:19:56 AM PST by
pgkdan
To: SJackson
Nice timing, chumps.
5 posted on
12/15/2003 7:22:43 AM PST by
dighton
To: SJackson
Walter was never good with timing, running against the greatest economic boon since the end of WWII
To: SJackson
Here are the choices:
1. 444 Days of Americans held hostage.
OR
2. Let's Roll!
9 posted on
12/15/2003 7:28:35 AM PST by
N. Theknow
(Be a glowworm, a glowworm's never glum, cuz how can you be grumpy when the sun shines out your bum.)
To: SJackson
Mondale said...'I cannot understand why the current administration believes that throwing all this out the window to be replaced by what I see to be their radical, unilateral, go-it-alone, in-your-face approach can strengthen America. I don't see how it can,Wally boy!
The UN was chicken to enforce it's resolutions!
France, Germany and Russia took sides against our country!!
Wally.............what's so hard to comprehend here?
Bush single-handedly saved the UN and shamed the cowardly French.
In my books, that kind of take-charge leadership has been 60 years in waiting.
Did FDR seek to get a coalition after Pearl Harbor?
No way!
In fact, before Pearl Harbor, America was in the same position as France and Germany was last fall.
Democrats.......ish!!
10 posted on
12/15/2003 7:32:17 AM PST by
CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
(I don't believe anything a Democrat says. Bill Clinton set the standard!)
To: SJackson
"The administration's policies are at odds with six decades of foreign policy..."A definition of insanity is repeating the same action over and over again, expecting a different result. It's high time to abandon six decades of failed policies, especially in the Mideast and North Korea.
Stability favors only in the instable.
To: SJackson
there is a reason these vermin were overwhelmingly defeated in national elections. Why don't they get a clue? Clinton only won because he ran on a right-leaning foreign policy vision (keyword: 'ran on').
12 posted on
12/15/2003 7:32:39 AM PST by
ilgipper
To: SJackson
Mondale...Mondale...nope, doesn't ring a bell.
14 posted on
12/15/2003 7:34:45 AM PST by
TheBigB
(Just because you talk slower...doesn't mean your thoughts are any deeper...)
To: SJackson
"'There has never been a time before when the United States was as isolated in terms of its foreign policy,' said Brzezinski, who is a professor of American foreign policy at Johns Hopkins University. Brzezinski also had a tough admonition for U.S. citizens about how their response to terrorism is being viewed around the world, especially in Europe, where terrorism has been relatively constant through the 20th century and beyond.
Let me get this straight. On the one hand we have Europe, which has experienced a good deal of terrorism. On the other hand, we have the US, which has not experienced much terrorism. And we are supposed to follow their lead? What am I missing here?
16 posted on
12/15/2003 7:38:14 AM PST by
LRoggy
To: SJackson
forming international coalitions to address national security problems Huh?
To: SJackson
This is precisely the group that allowed Islamic Terrorism to spread internationally.
23 posted on
09/08/2004 6:27:53 AM PDT by
eniapmot
(and no, I did not read the article)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson