Skip to comments.
UFO Invasion at Rendlesham on the SCI FI channel (Live Thread)
www.scifi.com ^
| Friday, December 12, 2003
| Bryant Gumbel
Posted on 12/12/2003 5:37:54 PM PST by Momaw Nadon
About the Rendlesham Incident
In late December 1980, in Rendlesham Forest, England, numerous U.S. military personnel witnessed what has come to be regarded as the most significant military-UFO incident in the history of Great Britain.
The servicemen were posted to the RAF Bentwaters and RAF Woodbridge facilities which together constitute one of the largest NATO bases in rural Suffolk, East Anglia when, on December 27, they noticed unusual lights and activity near the base's back gate. A trio of security patrolmen led by Jim Penniston, thinking a military aircraft might be down or in distress, ventured into Rendlesham Forest to investigate. There they observed a variety of unearthly phenomena that none of them could explain, as well as an airborne object obscured by its own blinding light.
The next day, December 28, they returned to the forest and found three radioactive depressions in the ground where the object had been sighted. That night, other witnesses in surrounding areas saw an intense red light pulsating and moving through the trees.
Soon afterward, several of the men involved, including Airman Larry Warren, were debriefed by U.S. and British officers and ordered to sign documents contradicting their firsthand accounts. Furthermore, they were told to remain silent and were warned by U.S. military intelligence personnel that, if they didn't, "Bullets are cheap."
Two weeks after these incidents, Lt. Colonel Charles Halt (who retired years later following his promotion to colonel) wrote a memo detailing everything that the patrolmen had seen and sent the document to his superiors at the Pentagon and the most comprehensive cover-up in the history of Britain began.
But the truth has refused to remain hidden. In December 2002, the British Ministry of Defense released a file on the Rendlesham incident that comprised 180 pages of previously classified memos, letters, reports and correspondence. But despite the British government's admission that a UFO-related incident took place near the Bentwaters and Woodbridge airfields in 1980, the U.S. government still refuses to release its own files about the encounter.
Now SCI FI brings you this shocking exposé, complete with documentation, new physical evidence and firsthand accounts by both military and civilian witnesses including Penniston and Halt, who have jeopardized their reputations and military pensions in order to seek out the truth. Join host Bryant Gumbel as SCI FI presents its exclusive investigation of one of the most important UFO incidents of the 20th century.
TOPICS: Announcements; Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; Unclassified; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: alien; bentwaters; british; bryantgumbel; coverup; eastgate; england; evidence; expos; expose; firsthandaccounts; forest; halttape; incident; invasion; kecksburg; meninblack; mib; military; ministryofdefense; nato; pentagon; radioactive; raf; rendlesham; rendleshamforest; roswell; scifi; sighting; ufo; witness; woodbridge
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180, 181-187 next last
To: FreedomCalls
If you deny that there are seriously evil puppet masters behind the scenes distorting political, military, economic, trade realities toward a Global Government Tyranny--then you
REALLY ARE IGNORANT
1) of Ike's warning in his farewell speech;
2) a wealth of data that goes back, in my experience at least 37 years.
But, hey, enjoy your ignorance. It will come crashing down around your ankles plenty soon. And then the comfort zones for all of us will probably be in a rapidly shrinking dynamic . . . unless we have our hands in the hands of the Man from Gallilee sp?
141
posted on
12/12/2003 10:42:35 PM PST
by
Quix
(Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
To: Momaw Nadon
My purpose in starting this thread was to have a nice, friendly, fun discussion of the UFO phenomenon. I had fun and am still friendly with everyboy (I hope). We'll discuss it further over a few cold ones* if you are ever in West Texas.
*I am referring to "beers" and not to "dead alien bodies."
142
posted on
12/12/2003 10:44:26 PM PST
by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
To: FreedomCalls
...Wrong. Try an official military incident corroborated by the MOD and investigated & covered up by the OSI.
143
posted on
12/12/2003 10:44:45 PM PST
by
Pro-Bush
(Homeland Security + Tom Ridge = Open Borders --> Demand Change!)
To: Quix
Oh, now they are "evil puppet masters." Okaaaaay.
144
posted on
12/12/2003 10:46:43 PM PST
by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
To: FreedomCalls
I'm quite comfortable with the reliability, authenticity, validity etc. of the basic ouline of such facts as I perceive them, sort them.
I've predicted fairly well the curve of the disclosure line in this vast field--certainly quite well enough for my own satisfaction.
But, hey, I've worked 7 or so years as a librarian--3.5 of them at a university special collections department with tons of documentation of puppet masters groups as well as other aspects of modern life that are not commonly known.
And, I've enjoyed sorting out signal from noise on a wide diversity of topics for most of my 56 year old adult life.
I am exceedingly comfortable with the reliability of the bulk of my stronger conclusions in this vast field. Most things I hold loosely. The smoke, mirrors, convoluted realities, disinformation etc. are toooooo common and enormous to settle 100% on too many even seemingly solid facts in all this.
However, you can construe my logic etc as you wish in order to sleep better. I understand that need quite well.
145
posted on
12/12/2003 10:46:58 PM PST
by
Quix
(Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
To: Pro-Bush
You mean dismissed by the MOD as a bunch of nonsense and what the heck is this "OSI"?
146
posted on
12/12/2003 10:48:37 PM PST
by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
To: FreedomCalls
Clearly none that would dent your cranium.
I don't know what to think of that assertion. I don't think it's true about the topic of tonight's program.
Unless one construes ALL ET visits as some do--as being from our future.
There are folks who assert that our government has an effective time traveling machine. I'm very skeptical about that.
I'm not sure of how much of dinking around with time God would allow mortals form our time/space dimension to get away with.
But, I could be wrong. We shall see.
147
posted on
12/12/2003 10:49:29 PM PST
by
Quix
(Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
To: Quix
Let me guess. California? Right?
148
posted on
12/12/2003 10:49:58 PM PST
by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
To: FreedomCalls
I just went to your Freep page. New Mexico. I would never have guessed it.
149
posted on
12/12/2003 10:51:15 PM PST
by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
To: FreedomCalls; Quix
I had fun and am still friendly with everyboy (I hope). We'll discuss it further over a few cold ones* if you are ever in West Texas.Thanks.
The same offer is extended to you all if you ever visit the Boston area. :)
150
posted on
12/12/2003 10:51:52 PM PST
by
Momaw Nadon
(Goals for 2004: Re-elect President Bush, over 60 Republicans in the Senate, and a Republican House.)
To: Quix
It's almost 1 in the morning here. I gotta go to bed. Night all.
151
posted on
12/12/2003 10:52:10 PM PST
by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
To: Momaw Nadon
Thank you.
152
posted on
12/12/2003 10:53:02 PM PST
by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
To: FreedomCalls
Sorry, You are right, technically,
the missle that they disabled the dummy warhead of after launch was topped with a dummy warhead as it was a test of the launch system etc.
But the dummy warhead was targeted by a laser beam 2-4 times as the UFO flew around the warhead in flight.
The military personnel who took the movies of the whole thing through the telescope designed for that were called to a high ranking general's? office where civilian suit types were also among the group and shown the movies the military personnel had taken.
When the UFO destroyed the warhead, the general asked the photog people what that was. The people, I think, responded that they didn't know--first time they'd noticed that as they hadn't seen the film on their own--but that it looked to them like a UFO.
Then the usual bit with the suits insisting that none of this had happened and cutting that section out of the film and keeping it.
But, hey--you can deny all that reality 100% if it helps you sleep better.
153
posted on
12/12/2003 10:53:30 PM PST
by
Quix
(Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
To: Pro-Bush
I don't think it's 100% disinformation.
It seems to me there was some authentic ET activity vis a vis the lasers on the weapons systems in the bunkers.
Of coourse, some disinformation programs can get prtty elaborate. I just don't think this was 100% disinformation.
Just doesn't appear or feel that way to me.
154
posted on
12/12/2003 10:54:56 PM PST
by
Quix
(Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
To: Momaw Nadon; andysandmikesmom; areafiftyone; bigfootbob; Ecliptic; El Sordo; Ghengis; ...
Much appreciated. I guess I should ping the list!
PING!
155
posted on
12/12/2003 10:56:38 PM PST
by
Quix
(Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
To: FreedomCalls
Wrong again.
They concluded that there was no evidence of a direct threat to national security, not dismissed, or that the incident didn't happened.
OSI=Air Force Office of Special Investigations (OSI)
156
posted on
12/12/2003 10:58:03 PM PST
by
Pro-Bush
(Homeland Security + Tom Ridge = Open Borders --> Demand Change!)
To: FreedomCalls
LIKEWISE (I hope).
157
posted on
12/12/2003 10:58:13 PM PST
by
Quix
(Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
To: FreedomCalls
So,
You
ARE IN FAVOR
of a Global world Government headed by the AntiChrist?
It is coming.
Has been coming for a long time.
Now we have an implantable SLAG (SLave tAG) that can fulfill all the Biblical prophecies about not being able to buy or sell without the AntiChrist's mark. . .
But since you are 100% convinced all that is nonsense, enjoy your sleep.
158
posted on
12/12/2003 11:00:24 PM PST
by
Quix
(Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
To: FreedomCalls
MOD released a LOT of pages affirming plenty about the incident.
Sheesh. I knew about OSI as a recent grad of Navy Boot camp almost 40 years ago.
159
posted on
12/12/2003 11:02:14 PM PST
by
Quix
(Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
To: FreedomCalls
No, New Mexico.
A 4 corners area town where 1957 saw a massive fly-over of UFO's covered in the local paper.
And, there was another more successfully hushed up crash less than 15 miles away.
160
posted on
12/12/2003 11:03:28 PM PST
by
Quix
(Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180, 181-187 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson