Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Legacy of Compassionate Conservatism [Rush Limbaugh on the Campaign Reform SCOTUS fiasco]
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_121003/content/truth_detector.guest.html ^ | December 10, 2003 | by Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 12/10/2003 8:57:47 PM PST by Lazamataz

The mainstream media is protected from the campaign finance law. Yes, Congress has limited the right to free speech of "We the People," but left the media's power intact. In fact, it's actually enhanced the media's power by letting them dominate the airwaves 30 to 60 days before an election.

But let me ask you a simple question: "If the Supreme Court can limit free speech today - under, I cannot believe, a GOP president, House and Senate - why can't it limit freedom of the press tomorrow? Once you amend the Constitution this way, anything goes!

Those who don't respect liberty - and by that I mean the left, these phony political reformers, most editorial pages and five Supreme Court justices - can't have it both ways. If the Constitution can be amended on the fly like this rather than through the 3/4ths majority in both houses of Congress and the states, then no aspect of the Constitution is safe from this kind of manipulation. All it's going to take is somebody in Congress to write a law saying, "We're going to put some regulations and restrictions on the broadcast and print media," and bingo...

Will that ever happen? No. The Congress is afraid of the media, but they are not afraid of you. Thus they felt free to pass a law taking away your most basic freedom: political speech. Why? What did you do wrong? Why, you corrupted the process! Yes, the way this ruling came down and the way the law was written, your rotten, dirty money is corrupting out courageous and brave elected officials. Why, as soon as they take a dime, they turn from angels into corrupt monsters! You're ruining their morals! So if you try to buy an ad, well, now there's a law to stop you rotten jerks!

I took some calls on this story, which you can hear below. These came from the same sort of people who were so sure Bush would veto the bill, or that the Supreme Court would overturn it, "So why fight it?" Frank in Auburn, Maine asked, "How long do you think it's going to be before we have a midnight session to overturn this in the Congress?" I gently told Frank that the very Congress that passed this abomination, and that is now insulated as incumbents from the annoying voices of you idiot voters, is not going to now right what it did. Hello?

They're overjoyed about this! So is the media - which debunks another caller's claim that the press would miss the ad revenue they'll lose from political ads. They'll still get the cash from all these other groups who've weaseled out of this law. This is worthy of more than a "whine," folks. After all, members of the House and Senate can easily get face time on TV. That's why I called this the "Incumbent Protection Act." This is a day of darkness, folks. We may as well be Hobbits, with dark cloaked figures looking for our rings.

Michael Barone, a brilliant guy, wrote the other day that this president is redefining conservatism from limited government to a government of choice and accountability. I disagreed with Mr. Barone for the first time in my life about something. Not only are we not advancing limited government, we are now limiting choice and accountability by restricting freedom of speech. We're not expanding anything that's conservative, here. We're not expanding liberty or expanding freedom - which is choice. That is the antithesis of what happened in the Supreme Court.

When all is said and done, when it comes to domestic issues, it looks to me like the legacy of the Republican control of Congress and the presidency for the first time in 50 years is going to be the largest entitlement in modern times, the greatest increase in domestic spending in modern times and one of the greatest set-backs for liberty in modern times. That's the legacy of Republican control of government. This may be "compassionate" conservatism, but it's not "conservatism" at all.


TOPICS: Announcements; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bushscotuscfr; cfr; mccainfeingold; rush
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-250 next last
To: dead; AppyPappy
Rush nails it better than he has in years.
21 posted on 12/10/2003 9:18:23 PM PST by Lazamataz (Hillary Clinton is a CLINQUANT without the LINQA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I wasn't asking you to pick a side; I was adding information to your post.

Ah. Thank you. I noticed before that you were shaken by the ruling. I'm glad you are staying with your principles. I sure will be.

22 posted on 12/10/2003 9:19:45 PM PST by Lazamataz (Hillary Clinton is a CLINQUANT without the LINQA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
I like your personality, Laz. What's your problem? Howlin posted a different take. Big deal.

Call me a Bush-bot, but NEVER associate me with anything Clinton.
23 posted on 12/10/2003 9:21:03 PM PST by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: BushisTheMan
Read this article. Then you can hate Rush Limbaugh too.
24 posted on 12/10/2003 9:21:14 PM PST by Lazamataz (Hillary Clinton is a CLINQUANT without the LINQA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
You're mocking me, aren't you?
25 posted on 12/10/2003 9:22:53 PM PST by Howlin (Bush has stolen two things which Democrats believe they own by right: the presidency & the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: onyx
I like your personality, Laz. What's your problem? Howlin posted a different take. Big deal.

The take -- if embraced -- is one of a scheming partisan, not a lover a liberty. I'm for the Bill of Rights, not for a very temporary, very illusory slight advantage.

26 posted on 12/10/2003 9:23:19 PM PST by Lazamataz (Hillary Clinton is a CLINQUANT without the LINQA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
You're mocking me, aren't you?

Quite the opposite. I saw you react with horror when the ruling first came down. I didn't keep up with your posts. I do hope you haven't embraced this monsterous decision.

27 posted on 12/10/2003 9:24:41 PM PST by Lazamataz (Hillary Clinton is a CLINQUANT without the LINQA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
The take -- if embraced -- is one of a scheming partisan, not a lover a liberty.

Gosh, you must feel so much better now that you've gotten that off your chest.

28 posted on 12/10/2003 9:24:52 PM PST by Howlin (Bush has stolen two things which Democrats believe they own by right: the presidency & the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn; Merdoug; Happy2BMe; CounterCounterCulture; k2blader
An exceptional piece from Rush Limbaugh about CFR.
29 posted on 12/10/2003 9:27:43 PM PST by Lazamataz (Hillary Clinton is a CLINQUANT without the LINQA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
No, because I am less free today.

From your sarcasm, it appears you have embraced this ruling, and will obediently line up with Mr. Bush.

Thank G-d you're as free to do exactly as they instruct you.

30 posted on 12/10/2003 9:30:02 PM PST by Lazamataz (Hillary Clinton is a CLINQUANT without the LINQA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
"This is a sad day for the freedom of speech. Who could have imagined that the same Court which, within the past four years, has sternly disapproved of restrictions upon such inconsequential forms of expression as virtual child pornography... tobacco advertising... dissemination of illegally intercepted communications... and sexually explicit cable programming... would smile with favor upon a law that cuts to the heart of what the First Amendment is meant to protect: the right to criticize the government. For that is what the most offensive provisions of this legislation are all about. We are governed by Congress, and this legislation prohib- its the criticism of Members of Congress by those entities most capable of giving such criticism loud voice: national political parties and corporations, both of the commercial and the not-for-profit sort. It forbids pre-election criticism of incumbents by corporations, even not-for-profit corporations, by use of their general funds; and forbids national party use of soft money to fund issue ads that incumbents find so offensive." -Justice Scalia 12-10-2003
31 posted on 12/10/2003 9:34:07 PM PST by Reagan Man (The few, the proud, the conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
How about we find a third party candidate that embraces sound conservative principles so we can show the Republican party how many votes they've alientated?

Rush Limbaugh's makin' sense for the first time in a few years... so..... Rush?

That's one possibility. Fielding full alternate Republican primary slates are another.

If that doesn't get the job done, a couple of other options exist.


32 posted on 12/10/2003 9:34:28 PM PST by archy (Angiloj! Mia kusenveturilo estas plena da angiloj!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
You're getting a bit bent --- I have not once posted my support for this ruling. I hate it, but I will not be a party to Bush bashing.

A democrat president will send me to the Cayman's, and send this country to hell.
33 posted on 12/10/2003 9:35:12 PM PST by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan; StoneColdGOP; aristeides; NittanyLion
An extremely well-crafted essay on CFR by Rush Limbaugh.
34 posted on 12/10/2003 9:37:01 PM PST by Lazamataz (Hillary Clinton is a CLINQUANT without the LINQA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
OK..............

So WHY is a "paid ad" from one group NOT REGULATED (since it is "not associated with a national party" (like Soros!), and a paid ad from a different group regulated and forbidden?
35 posted on 12/10/2003 9:38:09 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only support FR by donating monthly, but ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
I will reply to you on another thread; I'm not posting to this one anymore.
36 posted on 12/10/2003 9:38:58 PM PST by Howlin (Bush has stolen two things which Democrats believe they own by right: the presidency & the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ambrose; TheAngryClam; NormsRevenge; little jeremiah
Rush Limbaugh has an excellent editorial on today's fiasco.
37 posted on 12/10/2003 9:45:36 PM PST by Lazamataz (Hillary Clinton is a CLINQUANT without the LINQA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz; Howlin
From your sarcasm, it appears you have embraced this ruling, and will obediently line up with Mr. Bush. Thank G-d you're as free to do exactly as they instruct you.

On the >1600 post thread on this issue from earlier,Howlin was a major defender of this atrocity and Bush's role in it

38 posted on 12/10/2003 9:45:44 PM PST by WackyKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
I think you hurt Howlin's feelings.
39 posted on 12/10/2003 9:45:50 PM PST by M. Thatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
So, what do we do the next time the repub's ask for a campaign donation?

Funny you should ask. I had a call from a pubbie "pollster" last week. "Wanted to know" how the president was doing. When I told him, he was ready, with a prepared script about how "we in the GOP are holding the line against the big-spending democrats" and so forth. Insulting, and pathetic. Then he asked me for a donation (surprise!).

Now here's the punch line. The fellow Republican who was calling me had an unmistakeable African accent. The chances of him being an American citizen, much less a Republican, are virtually nil. In all probability he was a foreign student working a commission job at some GOP-licensed telemarketing phone bank. This is what my party has become: a mafia of cynical spinners, raising funds purely to maintain themselves and in the process raise even more funds. Feeding the beast is all.

40 posted on 12/10/2003 9:46:42 PM PST by Romulus (Nothing really good ever happened after 1789.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-250 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson