To: biblewonk
Don't pray for me, just don't lie about what I said. It's right there on my profile page, I hate lies and the people who tell them. I never said the dollar cost of wind power was bad, I even aknowledged that it was good, but the land cost is too high and the reliability too low. Those have been my complaints the entire time and they've been made very clearly. When you lied about my position that made you an enemy and so you shall remain until you retract and apologize.
128 posted on
12/09/2003 7:29:29 AM PST by
discostu
(that's a waste of a perfectly good white boy)
To: discostu
-- from what you said earlier-- Let's see we have an energy source that costs almost as much to build as a nuclear power plant, costs almost as much to maintain as a nuclear power plant, takes up much more space than a nuclear power plant (like 10 to 100 times the space), and produces an insignificant portion of the electricity (like 1/100 to 1/1000 the electricity). Sounds like a silly energy source to me. I guess you don't understand what you are posting then. This implies a very very expensive form of energy. It would have to be about a thousand times as exensive as a nuke, but as I said, you don't understand what you are saying. No wonder you get offended when I actually understand it and sum up.
130 posted on
12/09/2003 7:40:56 AM PST by
biblewonk
(I must try to answer all bible questions.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson