Skip to comments.
Sunday Morning Talk Show Thread 7 Dec 2003
Various big media television networks ^
| 7 Dec 2003
| Various Self-Serving Politicians and Big Media Screaming Faces
Posted on 12/07/2003 4:27:42 AM PST by Alas Babylon!
The Talk Shows
Sunday, December 7th, 2003
Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:
FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): White House Chief of Staff Andrew H. Card Jr. and former Vermont governor Howard Dean (D).
MEET THE PRESS (NBC): Former House speaker Newt Gingrich (R-GA) and Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY).
FACE THE NATION (CBS): Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) and White House Chief of Staff Andrew H. Card.
THIS WEEK (ABC): Former Israeli justice minister Yossi Beilin, former Palestinian information minister Yasser Abed Rabbo and Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY).
LATE EDITION (CNN) : Chuck Hagel (R-NE) and Christopher J. Dodd (D-CT); King Abdullah of Jordan; Dore Gold, adviser to Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon; former Palestinian information minister Yasser Rabbo; Israeli justice minister Yossi Beilin; and White House Chief of Staff Andrew H. Card.
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: facethenation; foxnewssunday; guests; lateedition; lineup; meetthepress; sunday; talkshows; thisweek
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 561-580, 581-600, 601-620 ... 741-760 next last
To: TomGuy
Alot of the same people thought it bizarre she'd ever be elected Senator, from New YorkNew York is the only place she could get elected, as it is full of the lying evil perverted baby killing socialist crooks that are her natural constituency.
Algore didn't win in his home state, and this evil bitch didn't run for Senate in Arkansas or Chicago, places she has actually lived in, because SHE COULDN'T WIN THERE.
She will never be President,and frankly I'm annoyed by those who say she can win.
581
posted on
12/07/2003 10:39:07 AM PST
by
Rome2000
(McCarthy was right!)
To: cajungirl
I liked your assessment of how to combat Hillary.Ridicule is one of the very best weapons in the arsenal.The old stuff won't work.There is much there to ridicule.Her speechmaking voice is a good place to start.
582
posted on
12/07/2003 10:40:46 AM PST
by
MEG33
To: STARWISE
Very possible. And, she'd only have to do 1 debate--against VP Cheney. Light interviews. Focus on the Presidential candidate, not her.
583
posted on
12/07/2003 10:41:17 AM PST
by
TomGuy
To: lawdude
She would have to do FNS and she would come off as a real doofus in a debate.
^^^
No she would not. She speaks in essay form - numbing the brain of her opponent from forming a response, and preventing any interlude for an acceptable interruption. This will be perceived as 'intelligence' and as 'winning' in the debate, by the average viewer.
584
posted on
12/07/2003 10:42:14 AM PST
by
maica
(Laus Deo)
To: Miss Marple
"Some of us believe that forewarned is forearmed."
--I don't disagree with that however giving her this kind of attention is really giving her the power she craves. After all, this is all she has. She has done nothing very significant as a NY Senator -- odds are she never will.
I just think giving her this kind of attention will defeat the purpose of what you hope to achieve -- getting rid of Hillary Clinton. I personally don't think she'll ever run for President. Just the idea that she might would run and win gives her far more power than actually running.
To: STARWISE
You are so right. My own brother, a union guy and not stupid, only hears what the union tells him and radio news.
So, he is supporting Kerry!
My democrat businesswoman sister is a HIllary fan. You can't convince her that she is a fraud. My sister thinks I have been brainwashed by Rush.
Now I have had success in converting 2 other sisters, but believe me, there are plenty of uninformed people who will vote for her.
Freepers should remember that stupid people also vote, and their votes are equal to ours.
Therefore, I don't think we should waste time on arguing facts with these people. We have to go for the emotions...painting Bush as a sympathetic figure and Hillary as a has-been.
That's my opinion, anyway.
To: MichelleSC
I missed the Wallace-Rove segment, but caught the rest of the show. He asked Dean some tough questions and put him into some difficult spots. Dean weaseled out of straight answers.
All-in-all, I think he did okay. For a change, being around a group where various viewpoints are tolerated, if not encouraged, may open Wallace's eyes and allow him more "fair & balanced" approach than was allowed at ABC.
587
posted on
12/07/2003 10:43:07 AM PST
by
auboy
(I'm out here on the front lines, sleep in peace tonight–American Soldier–Toby Keith, Chuck Cannon)
To: STARWISE
Excellent comments! Keep posting them!!
588
posted on
12/07/2003 10:47:41 AM PST
by
maica
(Laus Deo)
To: MichelleSC
Michelle, we tried iignoring this person after January, 2001. I notoice she didn't go away.
I don't care if she wants to perceive herself as powerful because everyone is talking about her. My concern is to keep her from having ACTUAL POWER, such as being elected president or vice president. That is what she is shooting for, no doubt about it.
Her gripes about the Clinton legacy being dismantled, the attacks on Bush in Iraq, the overseas trips, this large-scale appearance today, all point to such a scenario.
If we stick our heads in the sand and ignore her, we will simply be brought down the way the WTC was.
To: Miss Marple
Look...I understand and appreciate your position as I share the same opinion of Hillary and Bill Clinton. I guess we just have different ways of dealing with it. And I don't advocate covering one's head with sand as the answer -- I just happen to think Hillary doesn't have as much power of persuasion as some people. Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe I'm right. All I know is that I'm sick of the Clintons lol
What's with the eye contact thing. Everytime Mrs. Clinton conspicuously lies, her eyes hit the floor. She cannot maintain eye contact for more than a second or two. Anyone else notice?
To: Reb Raider
Talk show thread Ping.
592
posted on
12/07/2003 11:03:48 AM PST
by
MEG33
To: Miss Marple
>>She is going to try to take the nomination from Dean, I would bet cash money on it.<<
I'm with you. AARGH!!!
I can't take it. I will run away! I'will not read a newspaper or watch TV if she runs!!
To: Miss Marple
Ridicule,Ridicule..and there is much to ridicule about her.
594
posted on
12/07/2003 11:07:51 AM PST
by
MEG33
To: CaptRon
I think it Hillary v. Dean would be quite interesting. With his temper, she might not get away with sidestepping the things the interviewers let her avoid. If she were to be called out about the stuff we all know she did, and by a Democrat, would be the stake through her heart. Dean might be her worst nightmare. I like it.
To: Rome2000
She will never be President,and frankly I'm annoyed by those who say she can win. Thank you! I've been saying the same thing - but for some reason there are a bunch of people on this site who practically attribute superhuman powers to her.
To: tgslTakoma
I must be out of practice for these frozen freeps, the temp today was 29 - tropical compared to our cANSWER freep last JanuaryI'm happy to say that my fingers have thawed out. It was colder last Jan, but not as windy. Wind chill this morning was about 10 degrees per WTOP radio.
Notice how it got real cold in DC when Hillary came back. Coincidence? I don't think so.
597
posted on
12/07/2003 11:13:27 AM PST
by
BillF
(Fight terrorists in Iraq & elsewhere, instead of waiting for them to come to America!)
To: NittanyLion
A good friend/neighbor who is male, attorney, and politically active tells us that MOST liberal men hate her and would never vote for her.
598
posted on
12/07/2003 11:15:28 AM PST
by
Peach
(The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: NittanyLion
I explained above the attitude of my sister. Hillary gets the hard-core democrats, and will get a large chunk of clueless women. Coupled with the willing help of the media and vote fraud, she has a chance. She isn't super-human, but we do have a lot of obstacles to overcome.
To: Wait4Truth
I'm not upset that FOX hired Chris Wallace. In order to be "fair and balanced" FOX has to have liberal points of view. It has Greg Jarret, formerl of MSNBC.
E.D. Hill on FOX and Friends is a liberal. She keeps Brian and Steve honest. All I want in the news are the facts. I can sort them out for myself.
600
posted on
12/07/2003 11:26:45 AM PST
by
yikes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 561-580, 581-600, 601-620 ... 741-760 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson