To: T'wit
I've been puzzling over legal guardianship. It evidently confers absolute power. Terri is a slave without any rights. In this incident, he takes away her first-amendment religious rights. Similarly, he won't let her have flowers, he bars visitors, he won't let her sit up, he won't let her go outside, he stole all her therapy money, he denies her needed medical treatment, he sticks her away in a back room, he has tried several times to deny her even her basic right -- life (fifth, fourteenth amendments). And, he denied her the Communion host when she received last rites.
Absolutely! And yet this Wolfson thing says that Michael R. Schiavo is an "outstanding husband." Shakespeare could have never devised such horrors!
To: Theodore R.
Wolfson obiously is not neutral. How could he possibly label Michael, surely the husband from hell, an OUTSTANDING husband?
68 posted on
12/06/2003 6:31:30 AM PST by
Dante3
To: Theodore R.
> this Wolfson thing says that Michael R. Schiavo is an "outstanding husband."
If Wolfson is married, he might try asking his wife what she thinks about Michael intentionally refusing Terri treatment for a urinary tract infection.
I'll bet he won't have to go on to questions two, about stealing Terri's wedding rings, and question three, shacking up with Jodi but refusing to divorce Terri because he wants to kill her for her estate.
69 posted on
12/06/2003 8:20:12 AM PST by
T'wit
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson