To: msmagoo
I hope the LifeNews story was correct. It sounds like if it is, Judge Greer will have to make a decision in the case, whether to appoint a new guardian or not.
If Judge Greer does the right thing, then I wouldn't think it matters what Judge Baird decides to do in Terri's case, assuming the new guardian wouldn't try to kill her off. It would matter in other cases though and I hope they settle it, but if Michael S. is no longer the guardian, I don't see how he can be the plaintiff in the case.
To: FR_addict
I hope the LifeNews story was correct. It sounds like if it is, Judge Greer will have to make a decision in the case, whether to appoint a new guardian or not. How soon would this have to be done??
51 posted on
12/02/2003 1:24:52 PM PST by
pollywog
(Psalm 121;1 I Lift mine eyes to the hills from whence cometh my help.)
To: FR_addict
Here's another one from Life News
http://www.lifenews.com/bio160.html Pinellas Park, FL (LifeNews.com) -- A judge on Tuesday granted a motion filed by Terri Schiavo's estranged husband Michael that would prevent attorneys for Governor Jeb Bush from taking depositions in the lawsuit related to Terri's Law. Bush's attorneys hope to gather evidence disproving Michael's claims that Terri would prefer to die than live in the disabled state she is in currently.
The decision likely means that a trial will not be held and the case will be decided on summary judgment soon...
To: FR_addict
I was under the impression that George W. Greer will not change the guardianship if Terri's Law is struck down by his Republican "pal" Douglas Baird. Now, it is certain that Baird will strike down the law. So aren't we back at square one, really?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson