Skip to comments.
Liberal Radio Group Says It Is Close to Acquiring 5 Stations
NYTIMES ^
| 12/01/03
| JIM RUTENBERG
Posted on 12/01/2003 7:09:02 AM PST by Pikamax
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
December 1, 2003 Liberal Radio Group Says It Is Close to Acquiring 5 Stations By JIM RUTENBERG
Democratic investment group planning to start a liberal radio network to counterbalance conservative radio hosts like Rush Limbaugh says it is close to buying radio stations in five major cities.
The acquisitions would represent a major move toward making the network real. After its conception was announced in February, many radio analysts and even some Democratic activists predicted that the network would face too many challenges to get off the ground, including finding stations to run its programming and bucking a historical record replete with failed liberal radio attempts.
But executives with the newly formed company, Progress Media, said late last week that if all went as planned they would have the network running by early spring, in time to be part of the public dialogue during the presidential campaign season.
The executives said the stations they were acquiring reached all radios in 5 of the 10 largest media markets: New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Philadelphia and Boston. They said they would buy stations in other markets in the near future.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: failure; liberalmedia; liberaltalkradio; marxist; propaganda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
To: OXENinFLA
Have you seen a list of the stations anywheres?
21
posted on
12/01/2003 7:32:43 AM PST
by
ken5050
To: tractorman
If Lib-Hate radio gets any following at all, it will put NPR out of businessThe best thing would be for libidiots to sink all their greenbacks into this losing venture, NPR is put out of our misery by Congress and defunded (we can dream, can't we?), then Socialist Radio tanks.
22
posted on
12/01/2003 7:33:21 AM PST
by
Kieri
To: Pikamax
Liberals just hate "Freedom of Choice"...unless of course its applied to those who
want to kill babies..
23
posted on
12/01/2003 7:34:10 AM PST
by
joesnuffy
(Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
To: Pikamax
It's always a pleasure to see 'Rats blowing money...
24
posted on
12/01/2003 7:35:29 AM PST
by
Axenolith
(Watch it, you don't want to getcher tie caught in that fan be... GEEUURKK!)
To: michaelt
I don't think they will or can buy the stations that Rush is on in those cities. They are too big.
They can either see Rush and the big audience move to another station, or pay Rush big bucks not to be on the air for the remainder of the contract (assuming that is even allowed in Rush's contracts, which I would doubt.)
To: Pikamax
I foresee five bankruptcies in the future.
26
posted on
12/01/2003 7:36:35 AM PST
by
CzarNicky
(The problem with bad ideas is that they seemed like good ideas at the time.)
To: Pikamax
It's pretty sad when the only way a liberal can get a talk show on radio is to buy the damned station!
27
posted on
12/01/2003 7:40:02 AM PST
by
jackbill
To: ken5050
No, I haven't looked yet.
You around JAX?
To: Pikamax
This is the equivalent of radical NPR trying to survive in the real market. Them libbies don't understand that a business needs to be profitable in order to survive. Good money after bad.
29
posted on
12/01/2003 7:42:05 AM PST
by
AD from SpringBay
(We have the government we allow and deserve.)
To: Pikamax
They will not be able to buy any of the top stations in any of the markets. They will only be able to afford 3rd tier stations that will give them "coverage", but not much else. This is going to be a smoke and mirrors deal.
30
posted on
12/01/2003 7:43:21 AM PST
by
jimbo123
To: Pikamax
Wait till they find out they'll have to run conservative programming to make any money. This is a giant rat hole for the liberals, and I encourage them to proceed at full speed ahead.
31
posted on
12/01/2003 7:44:32 AM PST
by
kylaka
To: OXENinFLA
Is Tony going to up against Rush's time slot? O'Reilly didn't have much success -- he's not heard around here on the independents. Rush on all followed by Dr. Laura or Sean. I can drive all across the SW and tune in 500 to 50,000 watt stations carrying Rush.
32
posted on
12/01/2003 7:50:36 AM PST
by
CedarDave
(Insted of using the new spel checkr, I'll just tpye as usal.)
To: Pikamax
Fox and Friends commented on this. The news director on this new network is a lady coming from CNN (American Morning, maybe?). The friends had a good time, remarking that she was moving into her own element now. (Sorry, didn't catch her name.) Steve ended by saying Fox would remain fair and balanced. It was a fun listen.
33
posted on
12/01/2003 7:57:03 AM PST
by
CedarDave
(Insted of using the new spel checkr, I'll just tpye as usal.)
To: Pikamax
ALWAYS keep in mind the neocommunists' use of diversion to shift the attention of normal people from the true purpose of their actions. There must be more to this that having radio with a liberal voice.
Could they be laundering Chinese cash, Mexican drug money, or something else? Assume some normal perosn tried to buy a radio station in each of thsee five markets, why would he be criticsed about by the ultra-left wing?
You communication techies, think this through for us. What do the neocommunists deviously accomplish as they divert our attention from it and simply whine that they are trying to build a response to the popular radio that most normal Americans like to listen to? There has to be something!
34
posted on
12/01/2003 7:58:17 AM PST
by
Tacis
To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
Bingo. Every bit they pour into this (millions of $$ and effort) will be money and effort that goes down the drain that they won't have available anymore to spend elsewhere.
To: All
Why would I tune into this network? I can get the same slant from ABC/CBS/NBC at 5:30 with the news. Later I can watch almost any network programming and get the same slant and bias and hatred that will be spewed by this "new" network. If I fancy myself as an intellectual I can listen to the BBC and impress the great unwashed of America with my false British accent. If I want to know what really goes on in the White House I don't need a new network, I am better informed by Martin Sheen during the latest episode of the West Wing. I can get everything I need to know about Crime and Punishment from the latest episode of Law and Order. If I want to hear what Al Franken has to say About Bush I can catch that venomous toad on Jay Leno from time to time. At least as much as I care to hear from him anyway. Your needs are surely different than mine. Why would I want to listen to James Carville when I can see Old Serpent Head featured on the Tim Russert Show on Sunday morning.
Are you picking up on a thread here? The market for this kind of drivel is, as they say on Wall Street, oversold. They are opening their pop-stand on a street crammed with similar stands. And, the traffic count is not going up. They are building the same tofu burger in a neighborhood where the market is saturated, and the buying public at large is asking "wheres the beef".
This "new" network is a textbook case of how not to start a business. It could very well lose the investors money faster than Enron if such a thing is possible. It violates the business principle of selling a product that the customer wants.
36
posted on
12/01/2003 8:13:22 AM PST
by
DeepDish
(Depleted uranium and democrats are a lot alike. They've both been sucked dry of anything useful)
To: Pikamax
Buying media for political reasons is as old as the country. Biases were obvious. What's interesting here is the coordination with the Dem party. If the stations are perseived as stooges of the Dems, they haven't got a prayer in the realm of ideas.
It could be entertaining. It's sometimes fun to listen to a sour-puss. But it won't effect anyone's voting pattern, which is obviously the point. This is an indirect contribution to the Dems and should be struck down so Hillary can't use the machinery for darker motives.
37
posted on
12/01/2003 8:22:49 AM PST
by
playball0
(Fortune favors the bold)
To: michaelt
KFI 640 is Clear Channel and is where Rush is located in L.A.
The thing is, there is another "network" called Pacifica Radio which is to the left of NPR. (they are also affiliated with NPR as well)
38
posted on
12/01/2003 8:41:00 AM PST
by
NathanR
(California Si! Aztlan NO!)
To: tractorman
If Lib-Hate radio gets any following at all, it will put NPR out of business. NPR will stay in business, if you can call them a business. Tax dollars and giant grants from various foundations keep them going along with donations from listeners.
If they actually had to operate like a business they would have gone out of business many many years ago.
39
posted on
12/01/2003 8:54:47 AM PST
by
Phantom Lord
(Distributor of Pain, Your Loss Becomes My Gain)
To: Pikamax
Yea! I can only wonder if Texas Jim Hightower will apply for a "host" position. He was great....not. Perhaps the libs and dems will dig up some Texas or Florida voters to listen to the liberal drivel.
40
posted on
12/01/2003 8:58:28 AM PST
by
Hidgy
(LONG LIVE THE REPUBLIC)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson