Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: texasbluebell
But Connelly appears unhit, though turned around to look behind at the Pres. If that one was the magic bullet, then has Connelly just not reacted yet?

People react in strange ways when they are shot. Some never even know they are shot until much, much later. Connally`s reaction is not unordinary. Sometimes it takes a few seconds before your body will react to the trama cause by a gunshot, sometimes you react immediately. You cannot look at the film and tell exactly when Connally was shot. That is a fact some will never accept.
89 posted on 11/25/2003 2:12:18 PM PST by Peace will be here soon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]


To: Peace will be here soon; _Jim; Shooter 2.5
Thanks for the input! Appreciate it. It does make sense that Connelly would not have reacted in the 2 or so seconds between those shots.
164 posted on 11/25/2003 7:52:42 PM PST by texasbluebell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

To: Peace will be here soon
People react in strange ways when they are shot. Some never even know they are shot until much, much later. Connally`s reaction is not unordinary. Sometimes it takes a few seconds before your body will react to the trama cause by a gunshot, sometimes you react immediately. You cannot look at the film and tell exactly when Connally was shot. That is a fact some will never accept.

The ont thing all the SBT apologists continue to gloss over is that Connally continues to hold his Stetson in his right hand long after he is supposedly hit by the same shot that causes Kennedy to reach for his neck. ABC's computer illustration and most other computer recreations conveniently leave the Stetson out of the simulation.

If his right wrist has been shattered by the gunshot, why is he still holding his hat? That's the one thing that still makes me doubt the whole SBT scenario.

I also noticed ABC simulation seems to move Connally well over into Nellie's side of the limo in time for the head shot. That, too, doesn't seem plausible to me although it's pointless except to say computer animation is not pure science.

304 posted on 11/28/2003 9:54:20 AM PST by Tall_Texan ("Is Rush a Hypocrite?" http://righteverytime2.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson