Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oswald brother says there was no JFK plot
AP ^ | 11-22-03 | Staff

Posted on 11/23/2003 11:36:02 AM PST by veronica

The shooting of President John F. Kennedy was not a political conspiracy but an almost spontaneous act by a troubled man who wanted attention, the brother of Lee Harvey Oswald says.

Oswald had been depressed, feeling since childhood that he was unwanted, and was looking for a way to grab the spotlight, Robert Oswald said in interviews on NBC's "Today" show Saturday, the 40th anniversary of Kennedy's death, and with ABC News.

"There was no conspiracy," Robert Oswald told NBC. "He made those decisions within himself."

The government-appointed Warren Commission also concluded in 1964 that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone, firing from the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository building where he worked in Dallas as the president's motorcade drove through Dealey Plaza.

"If you go right down the line and look at it, all the facts will point to Lee's involvement. Lee actually committed the crime, period," Robert Oswald told ABC.

As children, the Oswald brothers had been placed in orphanages by their mother after their father died. Lee Harvey was barely 3 when he was sent away the day after Christmas, Robert Oswald said.

"Very early on, he learned that he wasn't wanted," he told ABC.

The killing of Kennedy, Robert Oswald said, was likely an attempt by his brother to get into the spotlight.

"Lee's political demeanor was simply a method of getting attention. He wanted to stand out, no matter what the crowd was. He was going to be different from the crowd," he told ABC. "If everybody had been Marxist, he would have been an American, vice versa. You know, Russian, whatever, he would have been opposite to stand out.

"The reason Lee went after the president is because of opportunity and no other. If he wasn't working where he was working or if the president's car wasn't going by there at that particular time, it wouldn't have happened. It wasn't a master plan or anything. There's no shadowy figures out there. He wanted to be somebody and this opportunity came about coincidentally, nothing planned, nothing organized."

Asked about his brother's denial after his arrest, Robert Oswald, who wrote "Lee: A Portrait of Lee Harvey Oswald" but rarely gives interviews, said his brother "was basically saying `I'm smarter than you. You gotta catch me.'"

Robert Oswald also described his last meeting with his brother, in jail the morning after Kennedy's death, a day before Lee Harvey Oswald was shot to death by nightclub owner Jack Ruby.

"I was looking into his eyes, searching for some sign," Robert Oswald told NBC. "And he just looked back at me, and finally he said, 'Brother, you won't find anything there.' And he was absolutely correct. there was no emotion. There was no flicker in the eye."


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: conspiracy; jfk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

1 posted on 11/23/2003 11:36:04 AM PST by veronica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: veronica
Nice try... But since JFK had his head blown out backwards, it would preclude the possibility of Oswald being the "lone gunman."
2 posted on 11/23/2003 11:41:52 AM PST by Capitalist Eric (To be a liberal, one must be insane, or ignorant of reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
The shooting of President John F. Kennedy was not a political conspiracy but an almost spontaneous act by a troubled man who wanted attention, the brother of Lee Harvey Oswald says.

Of course he said that. It's all part of the conspiracy, people!

3 posted on 11/23/2003 11:46:48 AM PST by Cathryn Crawford (La respuesta no se puede encontrar aquĆ­, tampoco.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cathryn Crawford
;)

The BS the conspiracy nuts want people to believe, is that Robert Oswald would ignore evidence that would clear his brother.

It's just plain crazy.

4 posted on 11/23/2003 11:49:02 AM PST by veronica ("I just realised I have a perfect part for you in "Terminator 4"....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: veronica
It's just plain crazy.

It was physically impossible for it to have been the work of just one man. Consider the physics- look at the Zabruder film. Even better, try to fire three bullets from a bolt-action rifle, and fire accurately over that distance at a moving target. I have friends who are professionals at such skills, and even they can't do it....

Therefore, since Oswald could not have done it alone, it is, by definition, a conspiracy. That you fail to recognize the realities of what I have told you, doesn't mean I'm crazy- just that you are uneducated as to the facts.

"...when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth."
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle

5 posted on 11/23/2003 12:06:42 PM PST by Capitalist Eric (To be a liberal, one must be insane, or ignorant of reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Capitalist Eric
It was physically impossible for it to have been the work of just one man.

No it wasn't not at all.

6 posted on 11/23/2003 12:07:45 PM PST by veronica ("I just realised I have a perfect part for you in "Terminator 4"....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: veronica
Well, if the word of a famous (or infamous) man was all we needed to convince us of the truth then Bill Clinton better do something about his brother's big mouth.
7 posted on 11/23/2003 12:11:59 PM PST by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
Undoubtedly, he came to this conclusion after close study of the transcripts of those 12 - 18 hours of interrogation by the Dallas Police Department. He probably also spent innumerable hours listening to the recordings that the Dallas Police Department made of all those hours of interrogation.

WHAT? No recordings? No transcripts? Not even a stenographer's notes on those hours of questioning? Hmmm. The cops must have been too busy finding a way to get Ruby back into a decent shooting position, since Ruby failed to shoot Oswald when the cops let him into Oswald's "press conference".

8 posted on 11/23/2003 12:13:25 PM PST by per loin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
No it wasn't not at all.

Your refusal to accept this reality, tells me you don't know much about guns- and nothing about how difficult it is to rapidly fire a bolt-action rifle.

Until you do become educated on such things, you aren't worth talking to.

(((sighing in disgust)))

Another woman who feels, but won't bother to think.

9 posted on 11/23/2003 12:14:10 PM PST by Capitalist Eric (To be a liberal, one must be insane, or ignorant of reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Capitalist Eric
Whoever did it was one hell of a shooter. I wonder if JFK could have survived the bullet through the neck if the shot that blew his brains out had missed.
10 posted on 11/23/2003 12:15:04 PM PST by dougherty (USA = FLOPHOUSE TO THE WORLD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dougherty
I wonder if JFK could have survived the bullet through the neck if the shot that blew his brains out had missed.

Indeed. I was thinking that this morning...

11 posted on 11/23/2003 12:18:49 PM PST by Capitalist Eric (To be a liberal, one must be insane, or ignorant of reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5
Ping. You're really going to get a kick out of this thread.
12 posted on 11/23/2003 12:23:54 PM PST by LanPB01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Capitalist Eric
Is that what you always do when you are debating with a woman? Accuse her of not having a brain. :)

Lots of conspiracy theories debunked here - and my opinion is based on what I know, from what I have read and studied, including the Warren Commission report.

AND Lee Harvey Oswald's brother agrees with me. He's a man, btw.

13 posted on 11/23/2003 12:29:32 PM PST by veronica ("I just realised I have a perfect part for you in "Terminator 4"....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: veronica
These threads remind me of all the hoopla that came out after the movie "Titanic."

In the end, what does it matter? The ship sank, they're all dead.

Same with this situation - what does it matter? Kennedy is dead, there's no bringing him back.

We can debate and argue what happened that day, we can debate and argue what it might have been like if it had never happened - but that's an unknowable.

Somewhere, down another leg of the Trousers of Time - President Kennedy lived and the world is perfect, or maybe not. And what does it matter? We're here - not there.
14 posted on 11/23/2003 12:30:25 PM PST by Tennessee_Bob (LORD, WHAT CAN THE HARVEST HOPE FOR, IF NOT FOR THE CARE OF THE REAPER MAN?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cathryn Crawford
People don't want to believe that ONE little man can change the course of history. But he can. And he did.
15 posted on 11/23/2003 12:33:26 PM PST by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
People don't want to believe that ONE little man can change the course of history. But he can. And he did.

Exactly.

16 posted on 11/23/2003 12:35:42 PM PST by veronica ("I just realised I have a perfect part for you in "Terminator 4"....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee_Bob
Yeah. Burn all those useless history books. Live as though the past had no effect on what we are as a nation today.
17 posted on 11/23/2003 12:37:26 PM PST by per loin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: per loin
Burn all those useless history books.

So - are we going to discuss the history that made our nation what it is? Or do you want to sit around and debate over shadows on a set of negatives?

My point - our nation changed because of Kennedy and because of his assasination - not because of the mechanics behind the event, but because of the event itself.

This thread, and so many others like it, obsesses over who did it, why they did it - not the effects that the President had on our national history.

18 posted on 11/23/2003 12:43:27 PM PST by Tennessee_Bob (LORD, WHAT CAN THE HARVEST HOPE FOR, IF NOT FOR THE CARE OF THE REAPER MAN?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Capitalist Eric
Another woman who feels, but won't bother to think.

Don't make this an issue of sex.

Gerald Posner thinks he ended the controversy with his book, denying a conspiracy.

Some females know a thing or two about rifles.

19 posted on 11/23/2003 12:50:35 PM PST by happygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: veronica
Oswald brother says there was no JFK plot

OH MY G-D! THEY GOT TO HIM, TOO!

20 posted on 11/23/2003 12:53:17 PM PST by Lazamataz (I like my women as I like my coffee: Cold and bitter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson