To: texasbluebell
WHO is bowing down to the WC report?
EXAMINE some of the material they looked at and come to some sort of RATIONAL conclusion yourself INSTEAD of soaking up all this conspiracy crap that's based on ... nothing in a lot of cases ...
THE mistake MOST people make is ignoring the primary documents themselves and leap instantly to the mind-numbing conspiracy crapola ...
238 posted on
11/23/2003 6:58:45 PM PST by
_Jim
( <--- Ann Coulter speaks on gutless Liberals (RealAudio files))
To: _Jim
We've had 39 years of mind-numbing crapola from the primary documents themselves..
Spare us more _jimbo. Have a heart.
246 posted on
11/23/2003 7:07:04 PM PST by
tpaine
(I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but FRs flying monkey squad brings out the Rickenbacker in me.)
To: _Jim
The HSCA itself refuted the WC, saying that there was probably a conspiracy -- they concluded that LHO was the one who fired 3 shots, but that he probably was not alone in this operation.
This they based not solely on the audio evidence which was later called into question, but other evidence too.
The HSCA did exclude most of the usual suspects from the list of those who were involved. They were "unable to identify the other gunman or the extent of the conspiracy."
link
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson