Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Burr5
The question us "kooks" might be excused for asking is whether he acted alone

The Oswald Agenda


By Jerry Organ

It's interesting to speculate on how much of Dealey Plaza would have survived if not for the assassination. The old Art-Deco Bryon Colonnade might have been deemed an eyesore and replaced with a strip mall. The Depository would have been just another worthless and antiquated warehouse, long-ago demolished in favor of a parking lot.

The saviour of Dealey Plaza wasn't a committee of cultural elitists and architectural experts. No politicans or businessmen saw potential in such a cause. Even the saviour didn't have preservation on his mind when he approached the Depository early on the morning of November 22, 1963. Destruction and mayhew were his goals.

Oswald had no Motive?

Over the years, critics have made much of the Warren Commission's "failure" to assign a specific motive to Lee Harvey Oswald. However, the Commission acknowledged it "has functioned neither as a court presiding over an adversary proceeding nor as a prosecutor determined to prove a case, but as a factfinding agency committed to the ascertainment of the truth." The Commission differentiated itself from a court with a prosecutor advancing a motive for the accused. Suggesting a singular motive would have meant speculation, which was not in the Commission's mandate of strict factfinding.

A review of Oswald's background and writings comprise Chapter VII of The Warren Report called "Lee Harvey Oswald: Background and Possible Motives." The Report of the House Select Committee on Assassinations in 1979 noted the conclusions of this chapter, adding: "Politics was the dominant force in his life right down to the last days when upon being arrested for the assassination, he requested to be represented by a lawyer prominent for representing Communists."

Socialist to Revolutionary

Oswald was a self-proclaimed Marxist since adolescence who deflected to the USSR in 1959 on his own initiative, offering to trade on his military experience with the Marines. Oswald's ideal of a Soviet utopia was immediately soured by bureaucratic indifference, causing Oswald to adopt revolutionary Marxism as opposed to institutionalized Leninism, perhaps inspired by some Cuban students he befriended while living in Minsk. By the time Oswald and his Russian-born wife Marina leave the USSR in June 1962, Oswald sees in the Castro revolution a truer form of socialism -- one not corrupted by Soviet Communist Party Officials and their perks.

Ironically, Oswald, as he planned the assassination of Dallasite General Walker ' an outspoken critic of Castro -- might have been expecting the act would ensure for him a prominent position in Havana, where he planned to eventually defect. The nighttime attempt on Walker on April 10, 1963 failed when Oswald's bullet was deflected by a window frame.

That summer, while living in New Orleans, Oswald was very active in defending Castro through leafletting and debating on radio. Oswald apparently tried to infiltrate some anti-Castro elements, perhaps to gather intelligence to impress Havana. All this effort turned out to be for nothing when Oswald was rejected at the Cuban embassy in Mexico City in early October -- a dejected Oswald wrote the Soviet embassy in Washington about the episode in a letter mailed November 12.

Oswald may have read David Harker's September 1963 interview with Castro that appeared in major US newspapers, quoting Castro as saying: "United States leaders should think that if they are aiding terrorist plans to eliminate Cuban leaders, they themselves will not be safe."

Jean Davison, in the 1983 book Oswald's Game, suggests Oswald could have read in The Militant -- the Socialist Workers' newspaper which he subscribed to -- of Castro's suspicions of US -- sponsored assassination attempts against him by the US, and acted in retaliation. Oswald would show Castro what a great revolutionary he missed out on.

Oswald Liked Kennedy?

Critics assert Oswald apparently "liked" President Kennedy, so why would he kill him? But place yourself into the mindset of a Marxist revolutionary; in 1918, there were many among the butchers of the Romanov family who "liked" them as people. Oswald cast aside any admiration for JFK as a person, seeing assassination as an opportunity to advance a greater cause. To Oswald, Kennedy was probably seen as a privileged politician who refused to condemn McCarthyism during the 1960 election, had dragged his feet on civil rights, humiliated Castro in the Missile Crisis, permitted far-right and anti-Castro extremism (as personified by General Walker) to increase, ordered the largest buildup of US Armed Forces in peacetime history, called for a 1,000 ICBMs, etc. This was before the canonization of Kennedy that followed his death ? by the fall of 1963, JFK was receiving a lot of criticism from both the right and left.

The Patsy

The JFK movie presented Oswald as a "fall guy." But how does a "patsy" improve his predicament by murdering a police officer, then attempting to murder the arresting officers? A genuine patsy would be anxious to turn himself into the police; betraying whoever he thought set him up would presumably work in his favor.

Instead of co-operating, Lee Oswald retrieves the revolver at his rooming house, eludes police as much as possible, then resorts to homicide when his path crosses that of authorities. In the pages of The Militant, all police were painted as thugs ? Oswald didn't think he would survive arrest.

Critics conveniently fail to disclose the full context in which Oswald announced he was a "patsy" as he passed reporters in the halls of the Dallas Police Department:

"They're taking me in because of the fact that I lived in the Soviet Union. I'm only a patsy."

Now, you might ask: What does Oswald's defection to the Soviet Union have to do with the reasons for his arrest at the Texas Theatre? Not a thing. Oswald was already posturing for the political trial he envisioned, becoming the typical political prisoner: victim of police brutality, denied an attorney, and railroaded for being a Marxist.

As soon as Oswald found a like-minded attorney, he would teach the world a thing or two about revolutionary Marxism. Oswald tried unsuccessfully that weekend to contact John Abt, a New York lawyer commended in The Militant for his work with the US Communist Party; Abt happened to be out-of-town at an isolated cottage in Connecticut.

Curtain Rods and a Ring

On Thursday, November 21st, Oswald, catching a ride with co-worker Wesley Frazier, unexpectedly visited his wife overnight at Ruth Paine's house in Irving. Marina knew the rifle was stored in Paine's garage but never suspected that as the reason for the visit. The next morning, Oswald left behind ? in an old wallet kept at the Paine house ? nearly all his savings: $170. Nearby remained his wedding ring.

Oswald was observed placing a wrapped package on the backseat of Frazier's car for the trip to work. Frazier also suspected nothing, accepting Oswald's explanation about bringing back "curtain rods," something he failed to mention to Marina and Mrs. Paine the night before, and would later deny to police.

After parking at the company lot two blocks north of the Depository, Frazier saw Oswald take the long, bulky package into the building. The sixth floor was in upheaval; workers were preparing to re-enforce the floor surface with plywood, and had opened up floor space by shifting boxes from along the west wall towards the east wall. Oswald had ready access and some privacy to build the Sniper's Nest and possibly assemble the rifle at intervals through the morning.

MORE: mcadams.posc.mu.edu/organ1.htm
173 posted on 11/23/2003 4:55:19 PM PST by _Jim ( <--- Ann Coulter speaks on gutless Liberals (RealAudio files))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]


To: _Jim
After parking at the company lot two blocks north of the Depository, Frazier saw Oswald take the long, bulky package into the building.

Actually, the driver said Oswald cupped the package between his palm and his armpit, therefore it was impossible for it to be the gun.

The sixth floor was in upheaval; workers were preparing to re-enforce the floor surface with plywood, and had opened up floor space by shifting boxes from along the west wall towards the east wall.

Yep, the building was owned by D.H. Byrd, an LBJ pal. They just happened to be redoing the floor up there during the assassination. A convenient excuse to have strangers running around the building that day setting up nests. Meanwhile Byrd was on a two-month trip to Africa. He would've stayed I'm sure had their plot been exposed (South Africa had no extradition policy). After two months he decided their little scheme had worked and returned. Plus, Byrd invested heavily in defense companies before leaving even though Kennedy had been planning to reduce involvement in Vietnam.

201 posted on 11/23/2003 5:56:23 PM PST by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson