[RANGERAIRBORNE]

OK, here goes- the detectives on a case ALWAYS believe that they have "enough evidence to convict" whoever it is they have decided committed the crime. That is why we have trials, and defense attorneys, and juries. Becuase sometimes they are wrong.

It sounds like some on this thread would eliminate all that excess baggage and just execute suspects based on the detectives conclusions about their guilt...

[_Jim]

It sounds like some on this thread would eliminate all that excess baggage

WHAT the h*ll are you smoking?

We're talking these guys have had 40 years (or so) to REFLECT on this case now ...

I'm still amazed how all you oddballs claiming enlightenment on this case haven't even touched the primary documents involved in this case YET espouse as you do as if you knew every aspect. Ignorance fosters boldness, eh?