To: Theodore R.
I believe Michael was given 10 days to explain to the court why he should retain guardianship, which wouldn't count the weekends, so I think that would mean early next week. I'd have to look up the date of that last hearing.
96 posted on
11/19/2003 9:03:01 AM PST by
sweetliberty
("Better to keep silent and be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.")
To: sweetliberty
I believe Michael was given 10 days to explain to the court why he should retain guardianship, which wouldn't count the weekends, so I think that would mean early next week. I'd have to look up the date of that last hearing This is the challenge by the Schindlers concerning guardianship, right? Will that be moot if Terri's law is ruled unconstitional?
I am starting to really get confused here...sigh.
98 posted on
11/19/2003 9:17:19 AM PST by
pollywog
(Psalm 121;1 I Lift mine eyes to the hills from whence cometh my help.)
To: sweetliberty
When Terri's Law is struck down by the FL Democrat Supreme Court, the potential change in guardianship will again be moot, and George W. Greer can again set a date for withdrawal of the feeding tube. These judicial liberals are just waiting to play out the clock; it's all rigged! No one ever really knew how committed the FL leadership class is to euthanasia until Terri's case alerted us.
It sounds like "prolife" Charles Crist is also supportive of euthanasia, for he is doing nothing thus far to help Terri.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson