Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

350-Million-Year-Old Fossils Found In Pa.
Local6 ^ | 11/18/03

Posted on 11/18/2003 11:09:31 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection

The Wyalusing Rocks were supposed to be just a scenic stop on Jennifer Elick's drive to Tuckhannock, where she and other Pennsylvania geologists planned to meet.

But then a spot of white caught Elick's eye in the red sandstone of those Bradford County cliffs.

"I thought to myself, 'Well, that's either a fossil, a fish fossil, or it's bird doo,'" said Elick, an assistant professor of geological and environmental sciences at Susquehanna University. "I reached up, grabbed it and looked at it, and it had teeth. It was a jaw, and it filled the palm of my hand, and was crumbling all over. That was pretty exciting."

What Elick found was a remnant of Pennsylvania's deep past, a period when what is now Bradford County was a tropical river delta, sitting at the border of land and sea.

Since finding that first fossil, the jaw of a Sarcopterygiian, or lobe-finned fish, in the spring of 2002, Elick has removed four plant and animal fossils from Wyalusing Rocks in northeastern Pennsylvania. All are denizens of the late Devonian period dating to some 350 million to 360 million years ago:

The lower jaw of a Sarcopterygiian, a prehistoric carnivore that moved along river bottoms.

A nearly intact Bothriolepis, an armored bottom-feeder with a tail like a shark.

The sand-filled stump of an Eospermatoperis, a tree that grew in the marginal areas where salt and fresh water met.

And Archaeopteris, thought to be the first tree to form actual forests.

Jon Inners, geologist manager for the Pennsylvania Geological Survey, said it's not surprising that Elick would find these fossils at Wyalusing Rocks, a 400-foot cliff over the Susquehanna River, about 130 miles north-northwest of Philadelphia.

Another fossil bed in the region, Red Hill, is renowned for Devonian fossils, and the Great Catskill Delta in New York and Pennsylvania is yielding more and more finds.

"But it's always neat because it's so rare," said Inners, who had examined the same cliffs before without finding anything.

"These rocks were red rocks, stuff that formed on river flood plains and river channels. And in these oxidized sediments fossils are mostly destroyed, they rot away. It takes rather peculiar conditions to preserve them," Inners said. "Somehow, the oxidizing waters did not get through to the fish that were buried there enough to decompose them. There were some hard parts that would have been preserved, but it's just rare to find fossils as complete as she found them."

The Sarcopterygiian jaw is so detailed that even the teeth, some almost an inch long, are clearly visible. The fish itself was probably at least 3 feet long, Elick said.

But the most interesting fossil might be the one Elick left behind -- a trace fossil, or the remnant not just of a creature, but of that creature's movement.

About 9 feet long and 6 inches wide, the trace appears to be left by a Sarcopterygiian, a fish whose fins had the same bone structure as arms on other vertebrates. The Sarcopterygiian is also thought to have been a precursor to amphibian development (although Elick points out that amphibians probably would have been around during the late Devonian, when her fossils were made).

The trace appears as a shallow trough, as if left by something skimming just above the silty soil of a river bottom. Traces along the side of the trough could have been made by the fish's fins.

"There's no other organism besides amphibians at this time that would have been large enough and is known to have made or left tracks," Elick said. "There are organisms that would have been big enough, but they would have left a different trace."

In prehistoric circles, dinosaurs get all the glory. But Elick said she hopes her discoveries on Wyalusing Rocks might get people interested in the creatures that ruled the world millions of years before dinosaurs came along.

"It's kind of neat to find out that there were large fish -- fish with teeth that were 2 centimeters long -- swimming in your back yard 350, 360 million years ago," Elick said. "It's kind of like having a dinosaur in your back yard."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fossils
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 11/18/2003 11:09:32 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I'm confused! I thought Ted Kennedy was from Massachusetts
2 posted on 11/18/2003 11:13:07 AM PST by RaginRak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaginRak
'Well, that's either a fossil, a fish fossil, or it's bird doo'

I was wondering what Helen Thomas was doing in Pa.

3 posted on 11/18/2003 11:16:09 AM PST by mountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
350-Million-Year-Old Fossils Found In Pa.

Yes, I was behind her today on highway 60 between Moon Township and the airport...

Grouchy old bitty too...

4 posted on 11/18/2003 11:16:15 AM PST by lovecraft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
As a youth I also fossil-hunted in Sullivan County, Pennsylvania. Check out World's End State Park and Eagle's Mere State Park, both of which sit atop glacial moraines. The sheer amount of fossils you'll find will astonish you.
5 posted on 11/18/2003 11:16:35 AM PST by Publius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mountaineer
I thought Robert Byrd had wandered over from West Virginia.
6 posted on 11/18/2003 11:19:07 AM PST by capt. norm ( I intend to live forever -- so far so good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
But it's always neat because it's so rare

Almost sounds like a Yogi-ism...

7 posted on 11/18/2003 11:20:03 AM PST by trebb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

8 posted on 11/18/2003 11:22:47 AM PST by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I will defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: capt. norm
You're right - the "bird doo" turned out to be Byrd droppings!
9 posted on 11/18/2003 11:23:34 AM PST by mountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mountaineer
Well, that's either a fossil, a fish fossil, or it's bird doo


10 posted on 11/18/2003 11:25:08 AM PST by SirChas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Back in the '50's my brother went on a vacation with my grandparents through upstae PA. He came home with cartons full of rocks containing fossils of a tropical sea type environment from a mountainous are of PA. He also picked up huge amythist rocks.
11 posted on 11/18/2003 11:29:50 AM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
It's still registered to vote in Florida...Democrat...
12 posted on 11/18/2003 12:06:27 PM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
YEC INTREP - F.A.C.E.
13 posted on 11/18/2003 12:08:24 PM PST by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
But it's always neat because it's so rare

I'm not sure what makes this 'rare'.
Between the coal deposits and the limestone, there's always been lots of fossils in Pennsylvania. Other sedimentary rocks as well: sandstone, shale, slate. Used to come across 'em all the time when I was a kid. Nothing really impressive, just outlines of leaves or seashells and such. But I was just a kid poking around with rocks. You'd think the professionals would routinely come up with better specimens than what I did.
Yep. "Rare" is a bit puzzling.

14 posted on 11/18/2003 12:19:05 PM PST by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
Eh, Vertebrate fossils (as these are) are a lot more rare than the hordes of mollusc and leaf fossils and whatnot.

Did you ever find any vertebrate fossils that old?
15 posted on 11/18/2003 12:34:56 PM PST by John H K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
The geologist was referring to finding anything in that particular rock strata as rare due to the deposition conditions and current erosion on the iron rich sediments which tends to acidify and ruin anything calcareous.
16 posted on 11/18/2003 12:37:32 PM PST by doodad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SirChas
Well, that's either a fossil, a fish fossil, or it's bird doo

Give me a clue, Sir Chazz. I can't tell which it is from the picture you posted.

17 posted on 11/18/2003 12:49:50 PM PST by Ole Okie (Go Sooners!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: John H K
Did you ever find any vertebrate fossils that old?

Not that I remember...
I was only 8~12 years old during my poking around in rocks phase.
If I did, I'd guess it was more likely in the coal than the limestone,
But heck, it's unlikely we were even looking for fossils, they were just there...
Yeah, they were cool to look at, at first,
but they get pretty old when we were actually hoping to find Indian arrowheads.
(It's kinda like fishing for bass or walleye, and catching nothing but bluegill. You get tired of rebaiting the hook and tossing the fish aside.)
Anyway, we were more likely to pick-up and keep some piece of river rounded and polished pebble "lucky stone" (quartz maybe?), simply because it was pretty and more colorful than ordinary rocks that we came across. We'd save those in a pouch where we kept our cats-eye marbles.

Never did find any arrowheads. By the time I was old enough to know what I was doing, my interests had turned more to sports.

18 posted on 11/18/2003 1:25:31 PM PST by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro; xsmommy
Hey, didjyinz guys ever find fossils 'nat when yinz were pokin' aroun' the rocks?
19 posted on 11/18/2003 1:39:39 PM PST by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy
So they dug you up, eh?
20 posted on 11/18/2003 1:41:01 PM PST by Chancellor Palpatine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson