[maisyday]

Have read this web site for a long time and found interesting conversations and saw FR mentioned a couple of times in different places (with signs)and finally registered - long family military history and very defensive and supportive of all military - no, Clark is not my man - please note mention of all the military who attempt to run for office. No, military people are not saints. I do not know any saints - the military is a very rough life and anytime I see horrible things about military people, I try to check them out and usually get defensive or try to prove my point - they're many, many stories about all of them and most conflicting. Most posts on this site are so proud of our military as am I.

[Miss Marple]

General Clark is held in contempt on this site precisely because he did NOT stick up for the troops, as well as for his involvement in WACO and his weasely actions in Kosovo.

You should know that this site is very supportive of the military. However, when a bad apple appears, such s Clark, he is not going to get a rubber stamp simply because he served.

[RedBloodedAmerican]

I try to check them out and usually get defensive or try to prove my point

You neither proved your point nor read the information provided you on this thread with links to additional resources.

Clark is in opposition to our CIC. You won't side with both of them. If you defend clark, you oppose the President we have now.

I suggest you check some of the info posted in html links by South40 and hobson on this thread, and read up on Clark before defending him. Defend the military, yes. But defend this individual? No. He is NOT speaking on behalf of the military. Do you understand that?

I suppose you also defend Timothy McVeigh, since he served also.

Maybe you would be better received over at DemocraticUnderwear.com or libertypost.com

[monkeywrench]

Still posting without researching? Go read!!!