Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Naspino
...but our technology could certainly help better prevent an attack if our rights were restricted...

Our technology can also be used to make your own life miserable, with no hope of ever regaining the blood-won freedoms. Security isn't worth loss of your freedoms!

You desperately need to read works by the Founding Fathers! You and your kind are ignorant about government in general and the foundations of your own government in particular. You MUST regard your fellow citizens as the base upon which all of the wonderful things you enjoy are built. Your fellow citizens are NOT your enemy. It is essential that you strive right to your last breath to preserve our way of life under the guidance of the Constitution. ANY restrictions of those rights is an abdication of what never belonged to the government in the first place.

I keep pointing out that security can be obtained without any loss of rights. If you exchange rights for security, you will have neither. Pay attention here!

The borders can be secured at the borders. This envolves control of border terrain and illegal invaders. It requires no control of American citizens. Technology can be used to detect and capture intruders.

An embedded id chip? Are you insane? A criminal lawyer explained something to be that you also need to know. Criminals must be defended with every means available because the government is interested ONLY in sending SOMEONE to jail for each crime. It is not necessary that it be the person who committed the crime. Attorney Generals are elected. They will be re-elected if their conviction rate looks good. Are these the fellows you want to track you from cradle to grave?

178 posted on 11/13/2003 1:35:23 PM PST by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]


To: GingisK
I don't know what I have to do to get you to see this part. "I don't agree with it.". I'm realistic that it will happen though. I don't believe the country has the will to sustain heavy internal casualties and if its not willing to solve the problem then what choice will it have?
182 posted on 11/13/2003 1:37:17 PM PST by Naspino (I am in no way associated with the views expressed in your posts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson