To: TexKat
Reuters is on the same journalistic bias level as Al-Jazeera, except Al-Jazeera has more credibility.
8 posted on
11/12/2003 8:33:59 AM PST by
dandelion
To: dandelion
You know the powers-that-be at Roooters were just licking their fingers with glee over those quotable Iraqi teens.
10 posted on
11/12/2003 8:37:04 AM PST by
ItsOurTimeNow
("Forth now, and fear no darkness!")
To: dandelion
Reuters is on the same journalistic bias level as Al-Jazeera, except Al-Jazeera has more credibility. Does it bother anyone that this Reuters jerk was watching the teenagers, who were watching the soldiers bleed?
11 posted on
11/12/2003 8:37:14 AM PST by
TC Rider
(The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
To: dandelion
Don't shoot the messenger all of the time. There are recent pictures of Iraqi youngsters jumping for joy after some of our troops are injured or killed. I guess you did not see the pictures of jubilance after the chinook was shot down and 16 of our guys died.
26 posted on
11/12/2003 8:47:20 AM PST by
TexKat
To: dandelion
Oh, no...Reuters is a distinguished unbiased press entity.>off
To: dandelion
Reuters is on the same journalistic bias level as Al-Jazeera, except Al-Jazeera has more credibility. That was the same thing I thought about the Leftist British news agency. Funny thing is that this "reporter"/propogandist was very close to saying the truth at the beginning.
If Washington doubts there is Iraqi public support for guerrillas killing its troops, it should consider the teenagers(News Media) who happily (forced viewers to) watched (ad-nausem) the American blood spilled Wednesday.
69 posted on
11/24/2003 11:04:37 AM PST by
PeoplesRep_of_LA
(Treason doth never prosper, for if it does, none dare call it treason)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson