To: Petronski
I guess, my point was, if the government charged a tax per call, the telemarketers who called your home, or cell, or work, would be charged a per charge call, and likewise, regular households and businesses would be charged per their calls. If, the government opted to charge a per phone call tax, they'd never would have agreed to a do not call list, it would reduce their revenue. And I would be against that.
To: Indy Pendance
If, the government opted to charge a per phone call tax, they'd never would have agreed to a do not call list, it would reduce their revenue...Got it. You don't want the fee to reduce calls, you want the fee so Uncle Sugar won't restrict the calls for fear of lost revenue.
That's no different than a bribe to Uncle Sugar to prevent the public will (the FDNC list) from becoming law.
One more time...just who here is supposed to be in favor of greater government involvement?
308 posted on
11/11/2003 8:31:27 PM PST by
Petronski
(Living life in a minor key.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson