Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Indy Pendance
If, the government opted to charge a per phone call tax, they'd never would have agreed to a do not call list, it would reduce their revenue...

Got it. You don't want the fee to reduce calls, you want the fee so Uncle Sugar won't restrict the calls for fear of lost revenue.

That's no different than a bribe to Uncle Sugar to prevent the public will (the FDNC list) from becoming law.

One more time...just who here is supposed to be in favor of greater government involvement?

308 posted on 11/11/2003 8:31:27 PM PST by Petronski (Living life in a minor key.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies ]


To: Petronski
I don't want it, I suggested it was proposed, and if that proposal was accepted, the government would not have accepted the idea of a no call list. It was just a theory.
309 posted on 11/11/2003 8:39:49 PM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson